Export limit exceeded: 380706 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (380706 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-31930 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Child socket (8EM1310-2EH04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Child socket/ shutter (8EM1310-2EN04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent cable 7m (8EM1310-2EJ04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent cable 7m incl. SIM (8EM1310-2EJ04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket (8EM1310-2EH04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket incl. SIM (8EM1310-2EH04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket/ shutter (8EM1310-2EN04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket/ shutter SIM (8EM1310-2EN04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3EJ04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Child socket (8EM1310-3EH04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Child socket/ shutter (8EM1310-3EN04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent cable 7m (8EM1310-3EJ04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent cable 7m incl. SIM (8EM1310-3EJ04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket (8EM1310-3EH04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket incl. SIM (8EM1310-3EH04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket/ shutter (8EM1310-3EN04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket/ shutter SIM (8EM1310-3EN04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3FJ04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3FJ04-0GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3FJ04-0GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child socket (8EM1310-3FH04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Parent socket (8EM1310-3FH04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Parent socket incl. SI (8EM1310-3FH04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Cellular 48A NTEP (8EM1310-5HF14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Child 40A w/ 15118 HW (8EM1310-4CF14-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Child 48A BA Compliant (8EM1315-5CG14-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Child 48A w/ 15118 HW (8EM1310-5CF14-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 40A with Simcard (8EM1310-4CF14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A (USPS) (8EM1317-5CG14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A BA Compliant (8EM1315-5CG14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A with Simcard BA (8EM1310-5CF14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A, 15118, 25ft (8EM1310-5CG14-1GA1) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A, 15118, 25ft (8EM1314-5CG14-2FA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A, 15118, 25ft (8EM1315-5HG14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A,15118 25ft Sim (8EM1310-5CG14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), VersiCharge Blue™ 80A AC Cellular (8EM1315-7BG16-1FH2) (All versions < V2.135). Affected devices contain Modbus service enabled by default. This could allow an attacker connected to the same network to remotely control the EV charger. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33024 | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5). The 'tcpdump' tool in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33025 | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5). The 'traceroute' tool in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33183 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Isaac-gr00t | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA Isaac-GR00T for all platforms contains a vulnerability in a Python component, where an attacker could cause a code injection issue. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3873 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| The following APIs for the Silcon Labs SiWx91x prior to vesion 3.4.0 failed to check the size of the output buffer of the caller which could lead to data corruption on the host (Cortex-M4) application. sl_si91x_aes sl_si91x_gcm sl_si91x_ccm sl_si91x_sha | ||||
| CVE-2025-4212 | 2 Wordpress, Wpwham | 2 Wordpress, Checkout Files Upload For Woocommerce | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| The Checkout Files Upload for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via file uploads in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in image files that will execute whenever a user accesses the injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42997 | 2026-04-15 | 6.6 Medium | ||
| Under certain conditions, SAP Gateway Client allows a high-privileged user to access restricted information beyond the scope of the application. Due to the possibility of influencing application behavior or performance through misuse of the exposed data, this may potentially lead to low impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43000 | 2026-04-15 | 7.9 High | ||
| Under certain conditions Promotion Management Wizard (PMW) allows an attacker to access information which would otherwise be restricted.This has High impact on Confidentiality with Low impact on Integrity and Availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43002 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| SAP S4CORE OData meta-data property allows an authenticated attacker to access restricted information due to missing authorization check. This could cause a low impact on confidentiality but integrity and availability of the application are not impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43004 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Due to a security misconfiguration vulnerability, customers can develop Production Operator Dashboards (PODs) that enable outside users to access customer data when they access these dashboards. Since no mechanisms exist to enforce authentication, malicious unauthenticated users can view non-sensitive customer information. However, this does not affect data integrity or availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43011 | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High | ||
| Under certain conditions, SAP Landscape Transformation's PCL Basis module does not perform the necessary authorization checks, allowing authenticated users to access restricted functionalities or data. This can lead to a high impact on confidentiality with no impact on the integrity or availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43712 | 1 Jhipster | 1 Generator-jhipster | 2026-04-15 | 2.9 Low |
| JHipster before v.8.9.0 allows privilege escalation via a modified authorities parameter. Upon registering in the JHipster portal and logging in as a standard user, the authorities parameter in the response from the api/account endpoint contains the value ROLE_USER. By manipulating the authorities parameter and changing its value to ROLE_ADMIN, the privilege is successfully escalated to an Admin level. This allowed the access to all admin-related functionalities in the application. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because there is no privilege escalation in the context of the JHipster backend (the report only demonstrates that, after using JHipster to generate an application, one can make a non-functional admin screen visible in the front end of that application). | ||||
| CVE-2025-4473 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The Frontend Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation due to a missing capability check on the ajax_request() function in versions 1.0 to 2.2.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to control where the plugin sends outgoing emails. By pointing SMTP to their own server, attackers could capture password reset emails intended for administrators, and elevate their privileges for full site takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4474 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The Frontend Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation due to a missing capability check on the fed_admin_setting_form_function() function in versions 1.0 to 2.2.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to overwrite the plugin’s 'register' role setting to make new user registrations default to the administrator role, leading to an elevation of privileges to that of an administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47278 | 2026-04-15 | 2.3 Low | ||
| Flask is a web server gateway interface (WSGI) web application framework. In Flask 3.1.0, the way fallback key configuration was handled resulted in the last fallback key being used for signing, rather than the current signing key. Signing is provided by the `itsdangerous` library. A list of keys can be passed, and it expects the last (top) key in the list to be the most recent key, and uses that for signing. Flask was incorrectly constructing that list in reverse, passing the signing key first. Sites that have opted-in to use key rotation by setting `SECRET_KEY_FALLBACKS` care likely to unexpectedly be signing their sessions with stale keys, and their transition to fresher keys will be impeded. Sessions are still signed, so this would not cause any sort of data integrity loss. Version 3.1.1 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5124 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Sony SNC-M1, SNC-M3, SNC-RZ25N, SNC-RZ30N, SNC-DS10, SNC-CS3N and SNC-RX570N up to 1.30. This affects an unknown part of the component Administrative Interface. The manipulation leads to use of default credentials. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. It is recommended to change the configuration settings. The vendor was contacted early about this issue. They confirmed the existence but pointed out that they "have published the 'Hardening Guide' on the Web from July 2018 to January 2025 and have thoroughly informed customers of the recommendation to change their initial passwords". | ||||
| CVE-2025-52578 | 1 Gallagher | 1 Command Centre | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| Incorrect Usage of Seeds in Pseudo-Random Number Generator (CWE- 335) vulnerability in the High Sec ELM may allow a sophisticated attacker with physical access, to compromise internal device communications. This issue affects Command Centre Server: 9.30 prior to vCR9.30.251028a (distributed in 9.30.2881 (MR3)), 9.20 prior to vCR9.20.251028a (distributed in 9.20.3265 (MR5)), 9.10 prior to vCR9.10.251028a (distributed in 9.10.4135 (MR8)), all versions of 9.00 and prior. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53524 | 1 Fujielectric | 1 Monitouch V-sft | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| Fuji Electric Monitouch V-SFT-6 is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds write while processing a specially crafted project file, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53603 | 1 Alinto | 1 Sogo | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| In Alinto SOPE SOGo 2.0.2 through 5.12.2, sope-core/NGExtensions/NGHashMap.m allows a NULL pointer dereference and SOGo crash via a request in which a parameter in the query string is a duplicate of a parameter in the POST body. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54596 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Abnormal Security /v1.0/rbac/users_v2/{USER_ID}/ before 2025-02-19 allows downgrading the privileges of other user accounts. | ||||