Export limit exceeded: 27435 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 380706 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 49757 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (49757 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-41650 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit input validation in cmd services of the devices, allowing them to disrupt system operations and potentially cause a denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31930 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Child socket (8EM1310-2EH04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Child socket/ shutter (8EM1310-2EN04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent cable 7m (8EM1310-2EJ04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent cable 7m incl. SIM (8EM1310-2EJ04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket (8EM1310-2EH04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket incl. SIM (8EM1310-2EH04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket/ shutter (8EM1310-2EN04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket/ shutter SIM (8EM1310-2EN04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3EJ04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Child socket (8EM1310-3EH04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Child socket/ shutter (8EM1310-3EN04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent cable 7m (8EM1310-3EJ04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent cable 7m incl. SIM (8EM1310-3EJ04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket (8EM1310-3EH04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket incl. SIM (8EM1310-3EH04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket/ shutter (8EM1310-3EN04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket/ shutter SIM (8EM1310-3EN04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3FJ04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3FJ04-0GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3FJ04-0GA2) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child socket (8EM1310-3FH04-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Parent socket (8EM1310-3FH04-3GA1) (All versions < V2.135), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Parent socket incl. SI (8EM1310-3FH04-3GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Cellular 48A NTEP (8EM1310-5HF14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Child 40A w/ 15118 HW (8EM1310-4CF14-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Child 48A BA Compliant (8EM1315-5CG14-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Child 48A w/ 15118 HW (8EM1310-5CF14-0GA0) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 40A with Simcard (8EM1310-4CF14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A (USPS) (8EM1317-5CG14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A BA Compliant (8EM1315-5CG14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A with Simcard BA (8EM1310-5CF14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A, 15118, 25ft (8EM1310-5CG14-1GA1) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A, 15118, 25ft (8EM1314-5CG14-2FA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A, 15118, 25ft (8EM1315-5HG14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), UL Commercial Parent 48A,15118 25ft Sim (8EM1310-5CG14-1GA2) (All versions < V2.135), VersiCharge Blue™ 80A AC Cellular (8EM1315-7BG16-1FH2) (All versions < V2.135). Affected devices contain Modbus service enabled by default. This could allow an attacker connected to the same network to remotely control the EV charger. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31929 | 2026-04-15 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Child socket (8EM1310-2EH04-0GA0) (All versions), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Child socket/ shutter (8EM1310-2EN04-0GA0) (All versions), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent cable 7m (8EM1310-2EJ04-3GA1) (All versions), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent cable 7m incl. SIM (8EM1310-2EJ04-3GA2) (All versions), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket (8EM1310-2EH04-3GA1) (All versions), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket incl. SIM (8EM1310-2EH04-3GA2) (All versions), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket/ shutter (8EM1310-2EN04-3GA1) (All versions), IEC 1Ph 7.4kW Parent socket/ shutter SIM (8EM1310-2EN04-3GA2) (All versions), IEC 3Ph 22kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3EJ04-0GA0) (All versions), IEC 3Ph 22kW Child socket (8EM1310-3EH04-0GA0) (All versions), IEC 3Ph 22kW Child socket/ shutter (8EM1310-3EN04-0GA0) (All versions), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent cable 7m (8EM1310-3EJ04-3GA1) (All versions), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent cable 7m incl. SIM (8EM1310-3EJ04-3GA2) (All versions), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket (8EM1310-3EH04-3GA1) (All versions), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket incl. SIM (8EM1310-3EH04-3GA2) (All versions), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket/ shutter (8EM1310-3EN04-3GA1) (All versions), IEC 3Ph 22kW Parent socket/ shutter SIM (8EM1310-3EN04-3GA2) (All versions), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3FJ04-0GA0) (All versions), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3FJ04-0GA1) (All versions), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child cable 7m (8EM1310-3FJ04-0GA2) (All versions), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Child socket (8EM1310-3FH04-0GA0) (All versions), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Parent socket (8EM1310-3FH04-3GA1) (All versions), IEC ERK 3Ph 22 kW Parent socket incl. SI (8EM1310-3FH04-3GA2) (All versions), UL Commercial Cellular 48A NTEP (8EM1310-5HF14-1GA2) (All versions), UL Commercial Child 40A w/ 15118 HW (8EM1310-4CF14-0GA0) (All versions), UL Commercial Child 48A BA Compliant (8EM1315-5CG14-0GA0) (All versions), UL Commercial Child 48A w/ 15118 HW (8EM1310-5CF14-0GA0) (All versions), UL Commercial Parent 40A with Simcard (8EM1310-4CF14-1GA2) (All versions), UL Commercial Parent 48A (USPS) (8EM1317-5CG14-1GA2) (All versions), UL Commercial Parent 48A BA Compliant (8EM1315-5CG14-1GA2) (All versions), UL Commercial Parent 48A with Simcard BA (8EM1310-5CF14-1GA2) (All versions), UL Commercial Parent 48A, 15118, 25ft (8EM1310-5CG14-1GA1) (All versions), UL Commercial Parent 48A, 15118, 25ft (8EM1314-5CG14-2FA2) (All versions), UL Commercial Parent 48A, 15118, 25ft (8EM1315-5HG14-1GA2) (All versions), UL Commercial Parent 48A,15118 25ft Sim (8EM1310-5CG14-1GA2) (All versions), UL Resi High End 40A w/15118 Hw (8EM1312-4CF18-0FA3) (All versions), UL Resi High End 48A w/15118 Hw (8EM1312-5CF18-0FA3) (All versions), VersiCharge Blue™ 80A AC Cellular (8EM1315-7BG16-1FH2) (All versions). Affected devices do not contain an Immutable Root of Trust in M0 Hardware. An attacker with physical access to the device could use this to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49775 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in Opcenter Execution Foundation (All versions < V2501.0001), Opcenter Intelligence (All versions < V2501.0001), Opcenter Quality (All versions < V2512), Opcenter RDnL (All versions < V2410), SIMATIC PCS neo V4.0 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 (All versions < V4.1 Update 3), SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 (All versions < V5.0 Update 1), SINEC NMS (All versions if operated in conjunction with UMC < V2.15), Totally Integrated Automation Portal (TIA Portal) V16 (All versions), Totally Integrated Automation Portal (TIA Portal) V17 (All versions), Totally Integrated Automation Portal (TIA Portal) V18 (All versions), Totally Integrated Automation Portal (TIA Portal) V19 (All versions). Affected products contain a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the integrated UMC component. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1960 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| CWE-1188: Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability exists that could cause an attacker to execute unauthorized commands when a system’s default password credentials have not been changed on first use. The default username is not displayed correctly in the WebHMI interface. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36998 | 2026-04-15 | 8.9 High | ||
| The NextEPC MME <= 1.0.1 (fixed in commit a8492c9c5bc0a66c6999cb5a263545b32a4109df) contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the Emergency Number List decoding method. An attacker may send a NAS message containing an oversized Emergency Number List value to the MME to overwrite the stack with arbitrary bytes. An attacker with a cellphone connection to any base station managed by the MME may exploit this vulnerability without having to authenticate with the LTE core. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11425 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| CWE-131: Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size vulnerability exists that could cause Denial-of-Service of the product when an unauthenticated user is sending a crafted HTTPS packet to the webserver. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10498 | 1 Schneider-electric | 1 Powerlogic Hdpm6000 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability exists that could allow an unauthorized attacker to modify configuration values outside of the normal range when the attacker sends specific Modbus write packets to the device which could result in invalid data or loss of web interface functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41234 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Description In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true: * The header is prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset). * The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input. * The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input. * The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details). An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true: * The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header. * The header is not prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via one of: * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String), or * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, ASCII) * The filename is not derived from user-supplied input. * The filename is derived from user-supplied input but sanitized by the application. * The attacker cannot inject malicious content in the downloaded content of the response. Affected Spring Products and VersionsSpring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.7 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.20 * 6.0.5 - 6.0.28 * Older, unsupported versions are not affected MitigationUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix versionAvailability6.2.x6.2.8OSS6.1.x6.1.21OSS6.0.x6.0.29 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. CWE-113 in `Content-Disposition` handling in VMware Spring Framework versions 6.0.5 to 6.2.7 allows remote attackers to launch Reflected File Download (RFD) attacks via unsanitized user input in `ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset)` with non-ASCII charsets. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41672 | 1 Wago | 1 Device Sphere | 2026-04-15 | 10 Critical |
| A remote unauthenticated attacker may use default certificates to generate JWT Tokens and gain full access to the tool and all connected devices. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41687 | 1 Weidmueller | 4 Ie-sr-2tx-wl, Ie-sr-2tx-wl-4g-eu, Ie-sr-2tx-wl-4g-us-v and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker may use a stack based buffer overflow in the u-link Management API to gain full access on the affected devices. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48869 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Improper restriction of software interfaces to hardware features for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processor with E-cores when using Intel(R) Trust Domain Extensions (Intel(R) TDX) or Intel(R) Software Guard Extensions (Intel(R) SGX) may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61481 | 1 Mikrotik | 2 Routeros, Switchos | 2026-04-15 | 10 Critical |
| An issue in MikroTik RouterOS v.7.14.2 and SwOS v.2.18 exposes the WebFig management interface over cleartext HTTP by default, allowing an on-path attacker to execute injected JavaScript in the administrator’s browser and intercept credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47072 | 2 Redhat, X-stream | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid, Ocp Tools and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| XStream is a simple library to serialize objects to XML and back again. This vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to terminate the application with a stack overflow error resulting in a denial of service only by manipulating the processed input stream when XStream is configured to use the BinaryStreamDriver. XStream 1.4.21 has been patched to detect the manipulation in the binary input stream causing the the stack overflow and raises an InputManipulationException instead. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may catch the StackOverflowError in the client code calling XStream if XStream is configured to use the BinaryStreamDriver. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45332 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.6 Medium |
| Exposure of sensitive information caused by shared microarchitectural predictor state that influences transient execution in the indirect branch predictors for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50738 | 1 Lexmark | 1 Printer Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A new feature to prevent Firmware downgrades was recently added to some Lexmark products. A method to override this downgrade protection has been identified. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23269 | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| NVIDIA Jetson Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel where an attacker may cause an exposure of sensitive information due to a shared microarchitectural predictor state that influences transient execution. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41975 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can gain limited information of the PLC network but the user management of the PLCs prevents the actual access to the PLCs. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68113 | 1 Altcha | 1 Altcha | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| ALTCHA is privacy-first software for captcha and bot protection. A cryptographic semantic binding flaw in ALTCHA libraries allows challenge payload splicing, which may enable replay attacks. The HMAC signature does not unambiguously bind challenge parameters to the nonce, allowing an attacker to reinterpret a valid proof-of-work submission with a modified expiration value. This may allow previously solved challenges to be reused beyond their intended lifetime, depending on server-side replay handling and deployment assumptions. The vulnerability primarily impacts abuse-prevention mechanisms such as rate limiting and bot mitigation. It does not directly affect data confidentiality or integrity. This issue has been addressed by enforcing explicit semantic separation between challenge parameters and the nonce during HMAC computation. Users are advised to upgrade to patched versions, which include version 1.0.0 of the altcha Golang package, version 1.0.0 of the altcha Rubygem, version 1.0.0 of the altcha pip package, version 1.0.0 of the altcha Erlang package, version 1.4.1 of the altcha-lib npm package, version 1.3.1 of the altcha-org/altcha Composer package, and version 1.3.0 of the org.altcha:altcha Maven package. As a mitigation, implementations may append a delimiter to the end of the `salt` value prior to HMAC computation (for example, `<salt>?expires=<time>&`). This prevents ambiguity between parameters and the nonce and is backward-compatible with existing implementations, as the delimiter is treated as a standard URL parameter separator. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66635 | 1 Seiko Epson Corporation | 1 Web Config | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in SEIKO EPSON Web Config. Specially crafted data input by a logged-in user may execute arbitrary code. As for the details of the affected products and versions, see the information provided by the vendor under [References]. | ||||