Export limit exceeded: 15834 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (15834 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-1481 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager | 2025-08-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco SD-WAN vManage Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct Cypher query language injection attacks on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to the interface of an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain sensitive information.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10382 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Androidx.car.app | 2025-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| There exists a code execution vulnerability in the Car App Android Jetpack Library. CarAppService uses deserialization logic that allows construction of arbitrary java classes. This can lead to arbitrary code execution when combined with specific Java deserialization gadgets. An attacker needs to install a malicious application on victims device to be able to attack any application that uses vulnerable library. We recommend upgrading the library past version 1.7.0-beta02. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52046 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Mina, Apache Camel Spring Boot | 2025-08-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| The ObjectSerializationDecoder in Apache MINA uses Java’s native deserialization protocol to process incoming serialized data but lacks the necessary security checks and defenses. This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the deserialization process by sending specially crafted malicious serialized data, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE) attacks. This issue affects MINA core versions 2.0.X, 2.1.X and 2.2.X, and will be fixed by the releases 2.0.27, 2.1.10 and 2.2.4. It's also important to note that an application using MINA core library will only be affected if the IoBuffer#getObject() method is called, and this specific method is potentially called when adding a ProtocolCodecFilter instance using the ObjectSerializationCodecFactory class in the filter chain. If your application is specifically using those classes, you have to upgrade to the latest version of MINA core library. Upgrading will not be enough: you also need to explicitly allow the classes the decoder will accept in the ObjectSerializationDecoder instance, using one of the three new methods: /** * Accept class names where the supplied ClassNameMatcher matches for * deserialization, unless they are otherwise rejected. * * @param classNameMatcher the matcher to use */ public void accept(ClassNameMatcher classNameMatcher) /** * Accept class names that match the supplied pattern for * deserialization, unless they are otherwise rejected. * * @param pattern standard Java regexp */ public void accept(Pattern pattern) /** * Accept the wildcard specified classes for deserialization, * unless they are otherwise rejected. * * @param patterns Wildcard file name patterns as defined by * {@link org.apache.commons.io.FilenameUtils#wildcardMatch(String, String) FilenameUtils.wildcardMatch} */ public void accept(String... patterns) By default, the decoder will reject *all* classes that will be present in the incoming data. Note: The FtpServer, SSHd and Vysper sub-project are not affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53928 | 1 Maxkb | 1 Maxkb | 2025-08-02 | 4.6 Medium |
| MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Prior to versions 1.10.9-lts and 2.0.0, a Remote Command Execution vulnerability exists in the MCP call. Versions 1.10.9-lts and 2.0.0 fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53927 | 1 Maxkb | 1 Maxkb | 2025-08-02 | 4.6 Medium |
| MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Prior to version 2.0.0, the sandbox design rules can be bypassed because MaxKB only restricts the execution permissions of files in a specific directory. Therefore, an attacker can use the `shutil.copy2` method in Python to copy the command they want to execute to the executable directory. This bypasses directory restrictions and reverse shell. Version 2.0.0 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3855 | 2 Codecanyon, Fairsketch | 2 Rise Ultimate Project Manager, Rise Ultimate Project Manager | 2025-08-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in CodeCanyon RISE Ultimate Project Manager 3.8.2 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /index.php/team_members/save_profile_image/ of the component Profile Picture Handler. The manipulation of the argument profile_image_file leads to improper control of resource identifiers. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32383 | 1 Maxkb | 1 Maxkb | 2025-08-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| MaxKB (Max Knowledge Base) is an open source knowledge base question-answering system based on a large language model and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). A reverse shell vulnerability exists in the module of function library. The vulnerability allow privileged users to create a reverse shell. This vulnerability is fixed in v1.10.4-lts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43845 | 1 Rvc-project | 1 Retrieval-based-voice-conversion-webui | 2025-08-01 | 9.8 Critical |
| Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI is a voice changing framework based on VITS. Versions 2.2.231006 and prior are vulnerable to code injection. The ckpt_path2 variable takes user input (e.g. a path to a model) and passes it to change_info_ function, which opens and reads the file on the given path (except it changes the final on the path to train.log), and passes the contents of the file to eval, which can lead to remote code execution. As of time of publication, no known patches exist. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5661 | 1 Revenera | 1 Installshield | 2025-08-01 | N/A |
| The Macrovision InstallShield InstallScript One-Click Install (OCI) ActiveX control 12.0 before SP2 does not validate the DLL files that are named as parameters to the control, which allows remote attackers to download arbitrary library code onto a client machine. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12882 | 1 Comfy | 1 Comfyui | 2025-08-01 | N/A |
| comfyanonymous/comfyui version v0.2.4 suffers from a non-blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This vulnerability can be exploited by combining the REST APIs `POST /internal/models/download` and `GET /view`, allowing attackers to abuse the victim server's credentials to access unauthorized web resources. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27774 | 1 Applio | 1 Applio | 2025-08-01 | 5.3 Medium |
| Applio is a voice conversion tool. Versions 3.2.7 and prior are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) and file write in `model_download.py` (line 156 in 3.2.7). The blind SSRF allows for sending requests on behalf of Applio server and can be leveraged to probe for other vulnerabilities on the server itself or on other back-end systems on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach. The blind SSRF can also be coupled with the an arbitrary file read (e.g., CVE-2025-27784) to read files from hosts on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach, which would make it a full SSRF. The file write allows for writing files on the server, which can be coupled with other vulnerabilities, for example an unsafe deserialization, to achieve remote code execution on the Applio server. As of time of publication, no known patches are available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27775 | 1 Applio | 1 Applio | 2025-08-01 | 5.3 Medium |
| Applio is a voice conversion tool. Versions 3.2.7 and prior are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) and file write in `model_download.py` (line 143 in 3.2.7). The blind SSRF allows for sending requests on behalf of Applio server and can be leveraged to probe for other vulnerabilities on the server itself or on other back-end systems on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach. The file write allows for writing files on the server, which can be coupled with other vulnerabilities, for example an unsafe deserialization, to achieve remote code execution on the Applio server. As of time of publication, no known patches are available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27776 | 1 Applio | 1 Applio | 2025-08-01 | 5.3 Medium |
| Applio is a voice conversion tool. Versions 3.2.7 and prior are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) and file write in `model_download.py` (line 240 in 3.2.7). The blind SSRF allows for sending requests on behalf of Applio server and can be leveraged to probe for other vulnerabilities on the server itself or on other back-end systems on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach. The blind SSRF can also be coupled with the arbitrary file read CVE-2025-27784 to read files from hosts on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach, which would make it a full SSRF. The file write allows for writing files on the server, which can be coupled with other vulnerabilities, for example an unsafe deserialization, to achieve remote code execution on the Applio server. As of time of publication, no known patches are available. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27777 | 1 Applio | 1 Applio | 2025-08-01 | 7.5 High |
| Applio is a voice conversion tool. Versions 3.2.7 and prior are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) in `model_download.py` (line 195 in 3.2.7). The blind SSRF allows for sending requests on behalf of Applio server and can be leveraged to probe for other vulnerabilities on the server itself or on other back-end systems on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach. The blind SSRF can also be coupled with a arbitrary file read (e.g., CVE-2025-27784) to read files from hosts on the internal network, that the Applio server can reach, which would make it a full SSRF. As of time of publication, no known patches are available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12392 | 1 Binary-husky | 1 Gpt Academic | 2025-07-31 | N/A |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in binary-husky/gpt_academic version git 310122f. The application has a functionality to download papers from arxiv.org, but the URL validation is incomplete. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to make the application access any URL, including internal services, and read the response. This can be used to access data that are only accessible from the server, such as AWS metadata credentials, and can escalate local exploits to network-based attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8257 | 3 Google, Lobby Universe, Lobbyuniverse | 3 Android, Lobby App, Lobby | 2025-07-31 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Lobby Universe Lobby App up to 2.8.0 on Android. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file AndroidManifest.xml of the component com.maverick.lobby. The manipulation leads to improper export of android application components. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8211 | 1 Roothub | 1 Roothub | 2025-07-31 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in Roothub up to 2.6. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Edit of the file src/main/java/cn/roothub/web/admin/SystemConfigAdminController.java. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8207 | 3 Canara, Canarabank, Google | 3 Ai1 Mobile Banking App, Ai1, Android | 2025-07-31 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Canara ai1 Mobile Banking App 3.6.23 on Android and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file AndroidManifest.xml of the component com.canarabank.mobility. The manipulation leads to improper export of android application components. Local access is required to approach this attack. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8206 | 1 Comodo | 1 Dragon | 2025-07-31 | 3.1 Low |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Comodo Dragon up to 134.0.6998.179. This affects an unknown part of the component IP DNS Leakage Detector. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1550 | 1 Keras | 1 Keras | 2025-07-31 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Keras Model.load_model function permits arbitrary code execution, even with safe_mode=True, through a manually constructed, malicious .keras archive. By altering the config.json file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading. | ||||