Export limit exceeded: 87692 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (87692 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-59200 | 2 Python, Python-pillow | 2 Pillow, Pillow | 2026-07-14 | 7.5 High |
| Pillow is a Python imaging library. From 5.1.0 until 12.3.0, PdfParser.PdfStream.decode() in PIL/PdfParser.py calls zlib.decompress() with bufsize set to the PDF stream Length field without bounding the decompressed output size, allowing a crafted FlateDecode PDF stream to exhaust memory from a small file. This issue is fixed in version 12.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15715 | 1 Sourcecodester | 1 Class And Exam Timetabling System | 2026-07-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /exam.php. Such manipulation of the argument day leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57101 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Visual Studio Code | 2026-07-14 | 7.1 High |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55030 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Sharepoint Server, Sharepoint Server 2016, Sharepoint Server 2019 | 2026-07-14 | 4.6 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49787 | 1 Microsoft | 16 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 13 more | 2026-07-14 | 7.5 High |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in Windows HTTP.sys allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45646 | 1 Microsoft | 4 .asp.net, .asp.netcore, Asp.net Core Odata and 1 more | 2026-07-14 | 7.5 High |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in ASP.NET Core allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54108 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Sharepoint Server, Sharepoint Server 2016, Sharepoint Server 2019 | 2026-07-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| External control of file name or path in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55145 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Copilot | 2026-07-14 | 6.3 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Outlook Copilot allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32986 | 1 Textpattern | 1 Textpattern | 2026-07-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| Textpattern CMS version 4.9.0 contains a second-order cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by exploiting improper sanitization of user-supplied input in Atom feed XML elements. Attackers can embed unescaped payloads in parameters such as category that are reflected into Atom fields like and , which execute as JavaScript when feed readers or CMS aggregators consume the feed and insert content into the DOM using unsafe methods. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32856 | 1 Ellucian | 2 Banner, Banner Self-service | 2026-07-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| Ellucian Banner Self-Service before the April T2 release (2025-04-23) contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser by injecting unsanitized input through the toDateFormat request parameter in the dateConverter endpoint. Attackers can craft a malicious URL targeting the unauthenticated dateConverter endpoint to steal session cookies or perform other malicious actions in the context of the victim's browser session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32852 | 1 Mailenable | 1 Mailenable | 2026-07-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.55 contain a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the webmail interface that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser by crafting a malicious URL. Attackers can inject malicious code through the StartDate parameter in the FreeBusy.aspx form, which is not properly sanitized before being embedded into dynamically generated JavaScript. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32851 | 1 Mailenable | 1 Mailenable | 2026-07-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.55 contain a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the webmail interface that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser by crafting a malicious URL. Attackers can inject malicious code through the StartDate parameter in the FreeBusy.aspx form, which is not properly sanitized before being embedded into dynamically generated JavaScript. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32850 | 1 Mailenable | 1 Mailenable | 2026-07-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| MailEnable versions prior to 10.55 contain a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the webmail interface that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser by crafting a malicious URL. Attackers can inject malicious code through the SelectedIndex parameter in the ManageShares.aspx form, which is not properly sanitized before being embedded into dynamically generated JavaScript. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28517 | 1 Opendcim | 1 Opendcim | 2026-07-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| openDCIM version 23.04, through commit 4467e9c4, contains an OS command injection vulnerability in report_network_map.php. The application retrieves the 'dot' configuration parameter from the database and passes it directly to exec() without validation or sanitization. If an attacker can modify the fac_Config.dot value, arbitrary commands may be executed in the context of the web server process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10658 | 2 Zephyrproject, Zephyrproject-rtos | 2 Zephyr, Zephyr | 2026-07-14 | 7.1 High |
| bt_iso_recv() in subsys/bluetooth/host/iso.c pulled the ISO SDU header (4 bytes) or, when the timestamp flag is set, the timestamped SDU header (8 bytes) from the inbound HCI ISO Data buffer via net_buf_pull_mem() without first checking buf->len. The upstream hci_iso() handler enforces buf->len == the controller-declared ISO Data_Load length, so a malicious or buggy controller / adjacent BLE peer on an established CIS/BIS can present a first-fragment (BT_ISO_START) or single (BT_ISO_SINGLE) PDU shorter than the SDU header. Because net_buf_simple_pull_mem only guards length with __ASSERT_NO_MSG (compiled out when CONFIG_ASSERT is disabled, the production default), the pull underflows buf->len (uint16_t, e.g. 0 - 8 = 0xFFF8) and advances buf->data past valid data: the subsequent reads of hdr->slen and hdr->sn are out-of-bounds reads of adjacent pool memory. For the multi-fragment (START) case the corrupted buffer is retained as iso->rx, and a following CONT/END fragment's net_buf_tailroom() guard underflows to a near-SIZE_MAX value, defeating the bounds check and causing net_buf_add_mem() to memcpy attacker-supplied fragment data far past the RX pool buffer (out-of-bounds write). The flaw affects ISO receive builds (CONFIG_BT_ISO_RX, selected by the default-off LE Audio options BT_ISO_PERIPHERAL/BT_ISO_CENTRAL/BT_ISO_SYNC_RECEIVER) and has existed since the ISO subsystem was introduced (v2.6.0) through v4.4.0. The fix adds explicit buf->len < sizeof(ts_hdr) and buf->len < sizeof(hdr) checks that drop the buffer before pulling. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10644 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-07-14 | 4.2 Medium |
| The Microchip SERCOM-G1 UART driver (drivers/serial/uart_mchp_sercom_g1.c), used by the PIC32CM-JH SoC family, contains an out-of-bounds write in its asynchronous (DMA) receive path. When uart_rx_enable() is invoked with a one-byte receive buffer (len == 1) and CONFIG_UART_MCHP_ASYNC is enabled, the RX-complete ISR starts a single-beat DMA transfer while a received byte is already pending in the SERCOM DATA register. On this SoC the peripheral-triggered DMA start sequencing then writes one byte past the end of the caller-supplied buffer (CWE-787). The overflowed byte's value is the UART RX data supplied by the connected serial peer (adjacent attacker), while its size and location are fixed at one byte immediately after the buffer. Exploitation requires the async UART config (not enabled by default on the in-tree PIC32CM-JH boards) and a consumer that enables RX with a one-byte buffer; impact is limited single-byte memory corruption adjacent to the RX buffer (possible crash / denial of service). The defect shipped in v4.4.0. The fix reads the first byte with the CPU and, for one-byte buffers, performs no DMA at all; for larger buffers it sizes the DMA for the remaining len-1 bytes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10643 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-07-14 | 8.7 High |
| Zephyr's IP socket recvmsg() implementation (subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_inet.c, insert_pktinfo()) validated the user-supplied ancillary (msg_control) buffer using only the payload length (msg->msg_controllen < pktinfo_len) before writing a full control message consisting of an aligned cmsg header plus the payload. Because the check omitted the cmsg header size, a control buffer whose length falls in the under-checked window (e.g. 16-27 bytes for IPv4 IP_PKTINFO on a 64-bit target, where a single element actually occupies 28 bytes) passes the guard yet causes a fixed-size out-of-bounds write of up to one cmsg header (~12 bytes) past the end of the buffer. Under CONFIG_USERSPACE the recvmsg verifier allocates a kernel-heap copy of the control buffer sized to msg_controllen and runs the implementation against it, so the overflow corrupts kernel heap memory and is triggerable from an unprivileged userspace thread; in supervisor mode it corrupts the caller's buffer. The path is reachable on a UDP/IP socket with IP_PKTINFO/IPV6_RECVPKTINFO (or hoplimit/timestamping) enabled when the application calls recvmsg() with an undersized control buffer and a datagram is received; part of the overwritten bytes (the destination IP in ipi_addr) is influenced by the received packet. The fix makes the capacity check use NET_CMSG_SPACE(pktinfo_len) (aligned header + aligned data) and returns -ENOMEM when the buffer is too small. Affected: v3.6.0 through v4.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10641 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-07-14 | 7.1 High |
| Zephyr's Bluetooth Classic Hands-Free Profile (HFP) Hands-Free role parser (subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/hfp_hf.c) contains an out-of-bounds write. During Service Level Connection setup the HF sends AT+CIND=? and parses the AG's +CIND: response in cind_handle(), which assigns a per-entry counter index and calls cind_handle_values() for each list element. cind_handle_values() then wrote hf->ind_table[index] = i without verifying that index is within the 20-element int8_t ind_table[] array of struct bt_hfp_hf. Because the parser places no cap on the number of +CIND: list entries, a remote Attendant Gateway (a malicious, compromised, or spoofed peer the device connects to over Bluetooth) can send a response with more than 20 recognized indicator entries and drive index arbitrarily large, writing a small attacker-positioned value past the array into adjacent struct fields (feature masks, SDP/version state, the calls[] array, work/atomic bookkeeping) and potentially beyond the static connection pool slot. This yields memory corruption and at least denial of service of the Bluetooth host, triggered by a single malformed AT response with no user interaction. The sibling consumer ag_indicator_handle_values() already performed the equivalent bounds check; this commit adds the same index >= ARRAY_SIZE(hf->ind_table) guard to close the gap. Affects builds with CONFIG_BT_HFP_HF enabled; introduced with the original HFP HF CIND parser (~v1.7) and present through v4.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50520 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Visual Studio Code | 2026-07-14 | 8.4 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56197 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows Admin Center | 2026-07-14 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Windows Admin Center allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||