Export limit exceeded: 11220 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11220 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-72049 | 1 Linux | 2 Kernel, Linux Kernel | 2026-08-15 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ieee802154: admin-gate legacy LLSEC dump operations In net/ieee802154/netlink.c, the legacy IEEE802154_NL family ops table builds the LLSEC dump entries (LLSEC_LIST_KEY, LLSEC_LIST_DEV, LLSEC_LIST_DEVKEY, LLSEC_LIST_SECLEVEL) with IEEE802154_DUMP() which sets no .flags, so generic netlink runs them ungated. The modern nl802154 family admin-gates the equivalent reads via NL802154_CMD_GET_SEC_KEY and friends with .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM. Any local uid that can open AF_NETLINK / NETLINK_GENERIC can resolve the "802.15.4 MAC" family and dump LLSEC_LIST_KEY on any wpan netdev that has an LLSEC key installed; the dump handler writes the raw 16-byte AES-128 key bytes (IEEE802154_ATTR_LLSEC_KEY_BYTES, copied verbatim from struct ieee802154_llsec_key.key) into the reply. Recovering the AES key compromises 802.15.4 LLSEC link confidentiality and authenticity, since LLSEC uses CCM* and the same key authenticates and encrypts frames. Impact: any local uid with no capabilities can read the raw 16-byte AES-128 LLSEC key from the kernel keytable on any wpan netdev that has an administrator-installed LLSEC key, by issuing an LLSEC_LIST_KEY dump on the legacy IEEE802154_NL generic-netlink family. Introduce IEEE802154_DUMP_PRIV() mirroring IEEE802154_DUMP() but setting .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM, and use it for the four LLSEC dump entries. LIST_PHY and LIST_IFACE retain IEEE802154_DUMP() because the modern nl802154 family exposes their equivalents to unprivileged readers by design (NL802154_CMD_GET_WPAN_PHY and NL802154_CMD_GET_INTERFACE carry "can be retrieved by unprivileged users" annotations). | ||||
| CVE-2026-72132 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-15 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFS: Charge unstable writes by request size, not folio size nfs_folio_mark_unstable() and nfs_folio_clear_commit() charge and uncharge NR_WRITEBACK/WB_WRITEBACK by folio_nr_pages(folio) once per *request* added to or removed from a commit list. This is correct only when a folio has a single associated request. When pg_test splits a folio into N sub-folio requests (e.g. pNFS flexfiles striping with a stripe unit smaller than the folio size, or plain wsize-limited splitting), each of the N requests independently charges the whole folio's page count, inflating the accounting by a factor of N per folio. With large folios and small stripe units this reaches multiple orders of magnitude: a 2 MiB folio split into 512 4 KiB requests can charge up to 512x its real size, pushing global dirty+writeback accounting past the system's dirty threshold and forcing every buffered writer on the host into the hard-throttle path, including unrelated in-kernel NFS server threads sharing the box. Charge each request only for the pages it actually covers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72045 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-15 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: octeontx2-af: cn10k: restrict VF LMTLINE sharing to its own PF rvu_mbox_handler_lmtst_tbl_setup() uses req->base_pcifunc as a direct index into the LMT map table to read another function's LMTLINE physical base address and copy it into the caller's own LMT map table entry. The mailbox dispatcher authenticates req->hdr.pcifunc from the IRQ source, but req->base_pcifunc is a separate payload field and is not sanitized. Reject the request with -EPERM when a VF caller's base_pcifunc is not a valid function under its own PF. is_pf_func_valid() bounds the FUNC field to the PF's configured VF count, keeping the computed index inside the caller's own slot block. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16541 | 2026-08-15 | N/A | ||
| The Simply Schedule Appointments WordPress plugin before 1.6.12.17 does not restrict the user records returned by some of its REST endpoints to those the requester is entitled to see, allowing users with a low-privileged staff role to disclose the names and email addresses of arbitrary registered users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58442 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass | ||||
| CVE-2026-58432 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-14 | 5.9 Medium |
| Missing Authorization and Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key and Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in code.gitea.io/gitea | ||||
| CVE-2026-58434 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| Private Repository Metadata Remains Accessible After Access Revocation | ||||
| CVE-2026-50105 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| RSS/Atom feed handlers bypass API-token scope & public-only confinement (incomplete fix of #37698) | ||||
| CVE-2026-55982 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-14 | 9.1 Critical |
| OIDC userinfo Endpoint Returns Identity Claims Without Enforcing API Token Scopes | ||||
| CVE-2026-58427 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| Private org member list leaked via /members API endpoint — incomplete fix for PR #38145 | ||||
| CVE-2026-54183 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-08-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| Apache Airflow's secrets masker hides values stored under sensitive key names when they are displayed in the UI. The masker's recursion-depth limit did not descend into values nested inside a list, tuple, or set beyond that limit, so an Airflow Variable holding such a deeply-nested value was shown unmasked in the Variables UI. The exposure is limited to the UI: any authenticated user who can see the Variable in the UI can already read its full value through the Variables REST API, so this does not disclose data the user could not otherwise obtain — the masking is a shoulder-surfing defense for the UI, not an access-control boundary. This is an incomplete-fix follow-up to CVE-2026-42358, whose fix made only the dictionary walk unbounded; lists, tuples, and sets beyond the depth limit remained unmasked in the UI. Deployments that applied the CVE-2026-42358 fix should also upgrade to address this residual case. Upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65017 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-08-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Apache Airflow's Config API did not mask team-scoped sensitive configuration values in multi-team deployments. When an administrator has enabled multi-team mode and exposed the Config API, an authenticated Viewer holding only configuration-read access — with no prior access to the secret — could read a team-scoped Celery broker URL, including its embedded credentials, in cleartext, while the equivalent global option was correctly masked. The secrets masker matched only base section and option names and did not normalize team-prefixed sections before the sensitivity check (CWE-200). This is a distinct masker bypass from CVE-2026-48828 and CVE-2026-48892: deployments that upgraded to apache-airflow 3.3.0 to address those issues remain affected by this team-scoped variant. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which normalizes team-scoped sections before masking. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58425 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| OAuth token introspection returns metadata of tokens issued to other clients (RFC 7662 section 4 violation) | ||||
| CVE-2026-56864 | 2 Golang, Gotoolchain | 2 Mod, Cmd/go | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| A malicious GOSUMDB was capable of serving arbitrary module content not contained within the transparency log. This attack allows for a coordinating GOPROXY and GOSUMDB to serve a client malicious module content that cannot be detected by evaluating the transparency log. In order to determine if you have been affected: rm -r go.sum go.work.sum vendor/ && go mod tidy | ||||
| CVE-2026-19837 | 1 Webkul | 1 Bagisto | 2026-08-14 | 2.7 Low |
| A weakness has been identified in Webkul Bagisto up to 2.4.4. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/customers/search of the component Customer Search. Executing a manipulation of the argument Query can lead to information disclosure. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor confirms: "The reported issues were already identified through our internal security assessment process prior to this notification and are being handled through our established internal security and development lifecycle. Some of these items have already been addressed, while the remaining items are planned for resolution in upcoming product releases." | ||||
| CVE-2026-73622 | 2 Gitpython-developers, Gitpython Project | 2 Gitpython, Gitpython | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| GitPython before 3.1.55 fails to disable environment variable expansion in Remote.create() and Submodule.add() URL handling, allowing attackers to exfiltrate secrets by supplying URLs containing variable references. Attackers can craft URLs with environment variable tokens that are expanded into .git/config and .gitmodules, then transmitted to attacker-controlled hosts during fetch or pull operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72834 | 1 Filebrowser | 1 Filebrowser | 2026-08-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| filebrowser before 2.63.19 contains a permission bypass in the /api/resources endpoint. The checksum (?checksum=) branch of resourceGetHandler reads the entire file to compute a digest and returns it without performing a Perm.Download check (unlike the sibling raw, preview, and subtitle paths). As a result, an authenticated user provisioned with Perm.Download=false can obtain a content-hash oracle for any same-scope file (md5/sha1/sha256/sha512), enabling confirmation of known/guessed content, change detection, and offline brute-force of low-entropy files. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-35606; it bypasses only the Download permission and does not defeat scope/path authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72804 | 2 B3log, Siyuan | 2 Siyuan, Siyuan | 2026-08-14 | 8.6 High |
| SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 fail to validate publish-password tier in getGraph and getLocalGraph endpoints, allowing anonymous readers to retrieve block-level content of password-protected documents. Attackers can call these endpoints without supplying a password to read protected document content and the complete reference topology. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67322 | 2 Gitpython-developers, Gitpython Project | 2 Gitpython, Gitpython | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| GitPython before 3.1.52 is vulnerable to environment-variable exfiltration in Repo.clone_from(). The caller-supplied remote URL is passed through Git.polish_url(), which on non-Cygwin platforms calls os.path.expandvars() on the URL before invoking git clone. An attacker who controls the clone URL can embed $NAME or ${NAME} tokens that are expanded to the values of the hosting process's environment variables (e.g., AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY or GITHUB_TOKEN). The resulting URL, now containing the secret, is transmitted over the network to an attacker-controlled host during the clone attempt, disclosing the secret. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66272 | 2026-08-14 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Dell Wyse Management Suite (WMS), versions prior to 2605.0.2, contain a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. | ||||