Export limit exceeded: 27261 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (27261 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3822 | 1 Cisco | 1 Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the logging subsystem of the Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Firepower Device Manager (FDM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to add arbitrary entries to the audit log. This vulnerability affects Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software versions 6.1.x on the following vulnerable products that have enabled FDM: ASA5506-X ASA5506W-X ASA5506H-X ASA5508-X ASA5516-X ASA5512-X ASA5515-X ASA5525-X ASA5545-X ASA5555-X. More Information: CSCvb86860. Known Affected Releases: FRANGELICO. Known Fixed Releases: 6.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2021-34756 | 1 Cisco | 3 Firepower Management Center Virtual Appliance, Secure Firewall Threat Defense, Sourcefire Defense Center | 2026-08-11 | 6.7 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the CLI of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20866 | 1 Cisco | 34 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Asa 5506-x, Asa 5506h-x and 31 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.4 High |
| A vulnerability in the handling of RSA keys on devices running Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve an RSA private key. This vulnerability is due to a logic error when the RSA key is stored in memory on a hardware platform that performs hardware-based cryptography. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a Lenstra side-channel attack against the targeted device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to retrieve the RSA private key. The following conditions may be observed on an affected device: This vulnerability will apply to approximately 5 percent of the RSA keys on a device that is running a vulnerable release of Cisco ASA Software or Cisco FTD Software; not all RSA keys are expected to be affected due to mathematical calculations applied to the RSA key. The RSA key could be valid but have specific characteristics that make it vulnerable to the potential leak of the RSA private key. If an attacker obtains the RSA private key, they could use the key to impersonate a device that is running Cisco ASA Software or Cisco FTD Software or to decrypt the device traffic. See the Indicators of Compromise section for more information on the detection of this type of RSA key. The RSA key could be malformed and invalid. A malformed RSA key is not functional, and a TLS client connection to a device that is running Cisco ASA Software or Cisco FTD Software that uses the malformed RSA key will result in a TLS signature failure, which means a vulnerable software release created an invalid RSA signature that failed verification. If an attacker obtains the RSA private key, they could use the key to impersonate a device that is running Cisco ASA Software or Cisco FTD Software or to decrypt the device traffic. | ||||
| CVE-2023-20063 | 1 Cisco | 2 Secure Firewall Management Center, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 8.2 High |
| A vulnerability in the inter-device communication mechanisms between devices that are running Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software and devices that are running Cisco Firepower Management (FMC) Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root permissions on the underlying operating system of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the expert mode of an affected device and submitting specific commands to a connected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of an FMC device if the attacker has administrative privileges on an associated FTD device. Alternatively, a successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of an FTD device if the attacker has administrative privileges on an associated FMC device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20388 | 1 Cisco | 4 Firepower Management Center, Firepower Threat Defense Software, Secure Firewall Management Center and 1 more | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the password change feature of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to determine valid user names on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper authentication of password update responses. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by forcing a password reset on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to determine valid user names in the unauthenticated response to a forced password reset. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20495 | 1 Cisco | 3 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firepower Threat Defense Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability in the Remote Access VPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of client key data after the TLS session is established. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted key value to an affected system over the secure TLS session. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11985 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-08-11 | 3.6 Low |
| On the Zephyr ARM port, enabling the hardware FPU (CONFIG_FPU) forces the "Floating point ABI" choice, which defaults to CONFIG_FP_HARDABI. Both FP_HARDABI and FP_SOFTABI permit the compiler to emit hardware FP instructions in any function, even code that never uses floating-point types. However, the callee-saved FP registers (s16-s31 / d8-d15) are only saved and restored across a context switch when CONFIG_FPU_SHARING is enabled (arch/arm/core/cortex_m/swap_helper.S and arch/arm/core/cortex_a_r/swap_helper.S), and prior to this fix selecting an ABI did not enable FPU register sharing, which defaults off. In a build that enables the FPU with the default ABI but leaves CONFIG_FPU_SHARING disabled, the kernel preserves no callee-saved FP register state across thread switches. The documented precondition for this "unshared" mode — that only a single thread ever executes FP instructions — is silently violated because the compiler may generate FP instructions in every thread. Under CONFIG_USERSPACE, where threads are mutually isolated, this becomes an information-disclosure boundary crossing: a victim thread can leave secret-derived values in s16-s31, and a co-resident unprivileged thread can read those registers directly (FP register access is not privilege-gated), recovering data left behind by another thread. Without userspace the same defect causes cross-thread FP state corruption (a correctness fault). The leak is bounded to the 16 callee-saved single-precision registers and is opportunistic, so impact is low. The fix makes FP_HARDABI and FP_SOFTABI select CONFIG_FPU_SHARING and tags every thread with K_FP_REGS at creation, so callee-saved FP state is always preserved across context switches whenever the compiler may emit FP instructions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72539 | 1 Windmill-labs | 1 Windmill | 2026-08-11 | 6.5 Medium |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in Windmill Labs Windmill through 1.783.0 allows any authenticated workspace member to read legacy ownerless draft scripts that contain plaintext resource credentials. Drafts with a null owner email bypass ACL enforcement and are returned to any workspace member who queries the drafts endpoint. Sensitive credentials stored in these drafts are exposed across ACL boundaries. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72915 | 1 Joinmastodon | 1 Mastodon | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| Mastodon is a free, open-source social network server based on ActivityPub. From 4.6.0-beta.1 until 4.6.4 and 4.7.0-beta.1, any logged-in local user could use the show action in app/controllers/admin/collections_controller.rb to access personally identifying information about another local user in a collection because the controller used the general collection policy instead of the admin collection policy namespace. The exposed data included the other user's current email address and last-used IP address. This issue is fixed in versions 4.6.4 and 4.7.0-beta.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71217 | 2 Iperf3 Project, Redhat | 2 Iperf3, Enterprise Linux | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in iperf3. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted control-channel JSON with oversized numeric parameters, such as `parallel` and `len`, which are not properly validated by the server. This improper input validation can lead to excessive stream and thread creation, as well as large buffer allocations, causing resource exhaustion. Consequently, this can result in a Denial of Service (DoS) on the affected iperf3 server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19074 | 2 Pluginsware, Wordpress | 2 Advanced Classifieds & Directory Pro, Wordpress | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Advanced Classifieds & Directory Pro Advanced Classifieds & Directory Pro WordPress plugin before 3.4.3 (<= 3.4.2) is vulnerable to unauthenticated sensitive information exposure via the AJAX action `acadp_public_custom_fields_listings`. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8861 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50312 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-08-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in GraphQL due to improper access controls on the GraphQL introspection query. This flaw allows unauthorized users to retrieve a comprehensive list of available queries and mutations. Exposure to this flaw increases the attack surface, as it can facilitate the discovery of flaws or errors specific to the application's GraphQL implementation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61316 | 1 Oracle | 2 E-business Suite, Edi Gateway | 2026-08-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle EDI Gateway product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: EDI). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle EDI Gateway. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle EDI Gateway accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-61315 | 1 Oracle | 2 E-business Suite, Edi Gateway | 2026-08-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle EDI Gateway product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: EDI). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle EDI Gateway. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle EDI Gateway accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-61303 | 1 Oracle | 2 E-business Suite, Edi Gateway | 2026-08-11 | 1.9 Low |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle EDI Gateway product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle EDI Gateway executes to compromise Oracle EDI Gateway. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle EDI Gateway accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 1.9 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-17541 | 2 Filemanagerpro, Wordpress | 2 File Manager, Wordpress | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| The File Manager WordPress plugin before 6.9.1 does not have authorisation checks on one of its REST API routes, allowing unauthenticated users to read its file activity log, disclosing the file operations performed on the site, the paths involved and the name of the user who performed them. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17542 | 2 Filemanagerpro, Wordpress | 2 File Manager, Wordpress | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| The File Manager WordPress plugin before 6.9.1 does not perform any capability check on one of its file manager connector endpoints, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to browse the entire WordPress installation directory and download files of certain types from it, including archives and documents which may contain sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21080 | 1 Samsung | 1 Smart Switch | 2026-08-11 | N/A |
| Cleartext storage of sensitive information in Smart Switch prior to version 3.7.72.6 allows adjacent attackers to access sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21083 | 1 Samsung | 1 Smart Switch | 2026-08-11 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in Smart Switch prior to version 3.7.72.6 allows adjacent attackers to access sensitive data. | ||||