Export limit exceeded: 377431 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (377431 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-58062 | 2 Bouncycastle, Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 6 Bc-java, Bouncy Castle For Java Lts, Fips Java Api and 3 more | 2026-09-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, Stapled OCSP response accepted without binding to the checked certificate. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-58061 | 2 Bouncycastle, Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 6 Bc-java, Bouncy Castle For Java Lts, Fips Java Api and 3 more | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, CCM-family modes write plaintext to caller buffer before tag check. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-58060 | 2 Bouncycastle, Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 6 Bc-java, Bouncy Castle For Java Lts, Fips Java Api and 3 more | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, HSS public-key level count unbounded, enabling huge allocation on verify. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-58059 | 2 Bouncycastle, Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 6 Bc-java, Bouncy Castle For Java Lts, Fips Java Api and 3 more | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, Quadratic-time escaping when stringifying X.500 distinguished names. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-18504 | 1 Fastify | 1 Fastify | 2026-09-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| fastify is a fast and low overhead web framework for Node.js. Versions of fastify before 5.12.1 are affected by a schema validation bypass when a request body schema targets a root primitive value. When the schema validates a top-level primitive such as an integer, Ajv can coerce a JSON string into the expected type during validation, but Fastify does not replace the root request body with the coerced value, so the route handler receives the original unvalidated string. As a result, a request that should have failed validation can reach application logic with a value that does not satisfy the schema, which can undermine integrity and access-control checks that rely on the validated type. Users should upgrade to fastify 5.12.1, which fixes the mismatch. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84800 | 1 Craftcms | 1 Craft Cms | 2026-09-02 | 7.1 High |
| Craft CMS versions >= 5.0.0-RC1 and < 5.10.11 contain a missing authorization vulnerability in AssetsController::actionReplaceFile. When a request supplies sourceAssetId and targetFilename but omits assetId, the target asset is resolved by folder and filename after the permission checks execute, so the replacePeerFiles permission is never enforced. An authenticated low-privilege author with only the replaceFiles permission on a shared folder can overwrite the content of a peer's asset file (located in the same folder) with attacker-controlled bytes. Fixed in 5.10.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8763 | 2 Bouncycastle, Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 6 Bc-java, Bouncy Castle For Java Lts, Fips Java Api and 3 more | 2026-09-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, Name Constraints bypass via trailing dot in rfc822Name and URI. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-59649 | 2 Bouncycastle, Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 6 Bc-java, Bcpg-fips, Bouncy Castle For Java Lts and 3 more | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, OpenPGP user-attribute subpacket length bounded only by JVM max memory. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpg-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-59651 | 2 Bouncycastle, Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 4 Bc-java, Bouncy Castle For Java Lts, Bc-java and 1 more | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, BKS keystore accepts legacy version with 16-bit integrity MAC key. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59652 | 2 Bouncycastle, Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 2 Bc-java, Bc-java | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, LDAP filter injection in legacy jdk1.4 LDAPStoreHelper. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72682 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user holding only low, read-level Agent Builder privileges could submit a specially crafted request that causes Kibana to consume an unbounded amount of memory, terminating the process and denying service to all users of the instance. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72652 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user can submit a specially crafted request that causes excessive resource consumption, which may render Kibana unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72644 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uncaught Exception (CWE-248) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Input Data Manipulation (CAPEC-153). An authenticated user holding only the low-privileged feature access required to use the Observability AI Assistant can submit a specially crafted request that produces an unhandled error condition, terminating the Kibana process and denying service to all users and spaces on that instance until it is restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36271 | 1 Ibm | 1 Integrated Analytics System | 2026-09-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Integrated Analytics System 1.0.0.0 through 1.0.31.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72641 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized modification of data via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). An authenticated user holding only Security Solution read access in a Kibana space could enumerate and change the state of Entity Store maintainer tasks, silently disabling Entity Analytics maintenance for that space. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72659 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A specially crafted, malformed payload submitted to a Kibana visualization feature by an authenticated user holding only low-privileged access is not correctly validated before use. Processing the request causes unbounded memory growth in the Kibana process, which is terminated by the host once available memory is exhausted. Kibana then becomes unavailable to all users until the service is restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72653 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user who is authorized to manage maintenance windows could submit a specially crafted, malformed payload that causes the Kibana process to consume excessive resources. Kibana becomes unresponsive for all users and does not recover without manual intervention. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72651 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user with read-only privileges to the alerting feature could submit a specially crafted, malformed payload that causes the Kibana process to consume excessive resources. A single request is sufficient to leave Kibana unable to serve requests for all users until the process is restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72650 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). An authenticated user who is authorized to read alerting rules in a single Kibana space could retrieve alerting rule execution telemetry that belongs to spaces the user is not authorized to access. The disclosed telemetry includes rule identifiers, rule names, space identifiers, execution outcomes, timestamps, and execution counters. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72629 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 7.1 High |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized cross-space access via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). The result is disclosure of inference output from a trained model in a different space that the user is not authorized to list, read, or use, which exposes the behavior of a model. The same pattern also reached the deployment stop and deployment update operations, allowing an active trained model deployment in another space to be stopped or to have its allocated resources altered. | ||||