Export limit exceeded: 88023 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (88023 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-31488 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortinac | 2025-12-16 | 6.1 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of inputs during web page generation vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiNAC version 9.4.0 through 9.4.4, 9.2.0 through 9.2.8, 9.1.0 through 9.1.10, 8.8.0 through 8.8.11, 8.7.0 through 8.7.6, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3 may allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform stored and reflected cross site scripting (XSS) attack via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31156 | 1 F5 | 22 Big-ip, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 19 more | 2025-12-16 | 8 High |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25613 | 1 Arubanetworks | 2 Arubaos, Sd-wan | 2025-12-16 | 7.2 High |
| Authenticated command injection vulnerabilities exist in the ArubaOS command line interface. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities result in the ability to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2389 | 1 Progress | 2 Flowmon, Flowmon Os | 2025-12-16 | 10 Critical |
| In Flowmon versions prior to 11.1.14 and 12.3.5, an operating system command injection vulnerability has been identified. An unauthenticated user can gain entry to the system via the Flowmon management interface, allowing for the execution of arbitrary system commands. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35849 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiadc | 2025-12-16 | 7.4 High |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in the management interface of FortiADC 7.1.0 through 7.1.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.2.0 through 6.2.5 and 6.1.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specifically crafted arguments to existing commands. | ||||
| CVE-2025-38334 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2025-12-16 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages TL;DR: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to secondary storage. SGX instructions do not gracefully handle machine checks. Despite this, the existing SGX code will try to reclaim pages that it _knows_ are poisoned. Avoid even trying to reclaim poisoned pages. The longer story: Pages used by an enclave only get epc_page->poison set in arch_memory_failure() but they currently stay on sgx_active_page_list until sgx_encl_release(), with the SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED flag untouched. epc_page->poison is not checked in the reclaimer logic meaning that, if other conditions are met, an attempt will be made to reclaim an EPC page that was poisoned. This is bad because 1. we don't want that page to end up added to another enclave and 2. it is likely to cause one core to shut down and the kernel to panic. Specifically, reclaiming uses microcode operations including "EWB" which accesses the EPC page contents to encrypt and write them out to non-SGX memory. Those operations cannot handle MCEs in their accesses other than by putting the executing core into a special shutdown state (affecting both threads with HT.) The kernel will subsequently panic on the remaining cores seeing the core didn't enter MCE handler(s) in time. Call sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() to remove the affected EPC page from sgx_active_page_list on memory error to stop it being considered for reclaiming. Testing epc_page->poison in sgx_reclaim_pages() would also work but I assume it's better to add code in the less likely paths. The affected EPC page is not added to &node->sgx_poison_page_list until later in sgx_encl_release()->sgx_free_epc_page() when it is EREMOVEd. Membership on other lists doesn't change to avoid changing any of the lists' semantics except for sgx_active_page_list. There's a "TBD" comment in arch_memory_failure() about pre-emptive actions, the goal here is not to address everything that it may imply. This also doesn't completely close the time window when a memory error notification will be fatal (for a not previously poisoned EPC page) -- the MCE can happen after sgx_reclaim_pages() has selected its candidates or even *inside* a microcode operation (actually easy to trigger due to the amount of time spent in them.) The spinlock in sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() is safe because memory_failure() runs in process context and no spinlocks are held, explicitly noted in a mm/memory-failure.c comment. | ||||
| CVE-2025-38348 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2025-12-16 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: p54: prevent buffer-overflow in p54_rx_eeprom_readback() Robert Morris reported: |If a malicious USB device pretends to be an Intersil p54 wifi |interface and generates an eeprom_readback message with a large |eeprom->v1.len, p54_rx_eeprom_readback() will copy data from the |message beyond the end of priv->eeprom. | |static void p54_rx_eeprom_readback(struct p54_common *priv, | struct sk_buff *skb) |{ | struct p54_hdr *hdr = (struct p54_hdr *) skb->data; | struct p54_eeprom_lm86 *eeprom = (struct p54_eeprom_lm86 *) hdr->data; | | if (priv->fw_var >= 0x509) { | memcpy(priv->eeprom, eeprom->v2.data, | le16_to_cpu(eeprom->v2.len)); | } else { | memcpy(priv->eeprom, eeprom->v1.data, | le16_to_cpu(eeprom->v1.len)); | } | [...] The eeprom->v{1,2}.len is set by the driver in p54_download_eeprom(). The device is supposed to provide the same length back to the driver. But yes, it's possible (like shown in the report) to alter the value to something that causes a crash/panic due to overrun. This patch addresses the issue by adding the size to the common device context, so p54_rx_eeprom_readback no longer relies on possibly tampered values... That said, it also checks if the "firmware" altered the value and no longer copies them. The one, small saving grace is: Before the driver tries to read the eeprom, it needs to upload >a< firmware. the vendor firmware has a proprietary license and as a reason, it is not present on most distributions by default. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28863 | 3 Isaacs, Node-tar Project, Redhat | 6 Tar, Node-tar, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2025-12-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| node-tar is a Tar for Node.js. node-tar prior to version 6.2.1 has no limit on the number of sub-folders created in the folder creation process. An attacker who generates a large number of sub-folders can consume memory on the system running node-tar and even crash the Node.js client within few seconds of running it using a path with too many sub-folders inside. Version 6.2.1 fixes this issue by preventing extraction in excessively deep sub-folders. | ||||
| CVE-2025-45805 | 1 Phpgurukul | 1 Doctor Appointment Management System | 2025-12-16 | 7.6 High |
| In phpgurukul Doctor Appointment Management System 1.0, an authenticated doctor user can inject arbitrary JavaScript code into their profile name. This payload is subsequently rendered without proper sanitization, when a user visits the website and selects the doctor to book an appointment. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3760 | 1 Liferay | 4 Digital Experience Platform, Dxp, Liferay Portal and 1 more | 2025-12-16 | 5.4 Medium |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists with radio button type custom fields in Liferay Portal 7.2.0 through 7.4.3.129, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q4.1 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.9, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 36, and 7.2 GA through fix pack 20 allows remote authenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into a page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43733 | 1 Liferay | 4 Digital Experience Platform, Dxp, Liferay Portal and 1 more | 2025-12-16 | 5.4 Medium |
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.7 allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript code via the content page's name field. This malicious payload is then reflected and executed within the user's browser when viewing the "document View Usages" page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43734 | 1 Liferay | 4 Digital Experience Platform, Dxp, Liferay Portal and 1 more | 2025-12-16 | 5.4 Medium |
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.10, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.1 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.16 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript code in the “first display label” field in the configuration of a custom sort widget. This malicious payload is then reflected and executed by clay button taglib when refreshing the page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43735 | 1 Liferay | 4 Digital Experience Platform, Dxp, Liferay Portal and 1 more | 2025-12-16 | 6.1 Medium |
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.131, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows an remote non-authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript into the google_gadget. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43736 | 1 Liferay | 4 Digital Experience Platform, Dxp, Liferay Portal and 1 more | 2025-12-16 | 4.3 Medium |
| A Denial Of Service via File Upload (DOS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.3.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.8, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.0 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.16 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows a user to upload more than 300kb profile picture into the user profile. This size more than the noted max 300kb size. This extra amount of data can make Liferay slower. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4388 | 1 Liferay | 4 Digital Experience Platform, Dxp, Liferay Portal and 1 more | 2025-12-16 | 6.1 Medium |
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.131, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.5, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12, 7.4 GA through update 92 allows an remote non-authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript into the modules/apps/marketplace/marketplace-app-manager-web. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1254 | 1 Rti | 1 Connext Professional | 2025-12-16 | 7.4 High |
| Out-of-bounds Read, Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in RTI Connext Professional (Recording Service) allows Overflow Buffers, Overread Buffers.This issue affects Connext Professional: from 7.4.0 before 7.5.0, from 7.0.0 before 7.3.0.7, from 6.1.0 before 6.1.2.23, from 6.0.0 before 6.0.1.42. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1252 | 1 Rti | 1 Connext Professional | 2025-12-16 | 7.1 High |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in RTI Connext Professional (Core Libraries) allows Overflow Variables and Tags.This issue affects Connext Professional: from 7.4.0 before 7.5.0, from 7.0.0 before 7.3.0.7, from 6.1.0 before 6.1.2.23, from 6.0.0 before 6.0.1.42, from 5.3.0 before 5.3.*, from 4.4d before 5.2.*. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43800 | 1 Liferay | 4 Digital Experience Platform, Dxp, Liferay Portal and 1 more | 2025-12-16 | 6.1 Medium |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Objects in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.20 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into an object with a rich text type field. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43776 | 1 Liferay | 4 Digital Experience Platform, Dxp, Liferay Portal and 1 more | 2025-12-16 | 5.4 Medium |
| A Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q2.0 through 2025.Q2.9, 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.16, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.0 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.19 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows an remote authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript through Custom Object field label. The malicious payload is stored and executed through Process Builder's Configuration tab without proper escaping. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2279 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-12-16 | 8.7 High |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 16.7 to 16.8.6 all versions starting from 16.9 before 16.9.4, all versions starting from 16.10 before 16.10.2. Using the autocomplete for issues references feature a crafted payload may lead to a stored XSS, allowing attackers to perform arbitrary actions on behalf of victims. | ||||