Export limit exceeded: 88023 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (88023 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-29112 | 1 Dicebear | 1 Dicebear | 2026-03-24 | 7.5 High |
| DiceBear is an avatar library for designers and developers. Prior to version 9.4.0, the `ensureSize()` function in `@dicebear/converter` read the `width` and `height` attributes from the input SVG to determine the output canvas size for rasterization (PNG, JPEG, WebP, AVIF). An attacker who can supply a crafted SVG with extremely large dimensions (e.g. `width="999999999"`) could force the server to allocate excessive memory, leading to denial of service. This primarily affects server-side applications that pass untrusted or user-supplied SVGs to the converter's `toPng()`, `toJpeg()`, `toWebp()`, or `toAvif()` functions. Applications that only convert self-generated DiceBear avatars are not practically exploitable, but are still recommended to upgrade. This is fixed in version 9.4.0. The `ensureSize()` function no longer reads SVG attributes to determine output size. Instead, a new `size` option (default: 512, max: 2048) controls the output dimensions. Invalid values (NaN, negative, zero, Infinity) fall back to the default. If upgrading is not immediately possible, validate and sanitize the `width` and `height` attributes of any untrusted SVG input before passing it to the converter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31938 | 1 Parall | 1 Jspdf | 2026-03-24 | 9.6 Critical |
| jsPDF is a library to generate PDFs in JavaScript. Prior to version 4.2.1, user control of the `options` argument of the `output` function allows attackers to inject arbitrary HTML (such as scripts) into the browser context the created PDF is opened in. The vulnerability can be exploited in the following scenario: the attacker provides values for the output options, for example via a web interface. These values are then passed unsanitized (automatically or semi-automatically) to the attack victim. The victim creates and opens a PDF with the attack vector using one of the vulnerable method overloads inside their browser. The attacker can thus inject scripts that run in the victims browser context and can extract or modify secrets from this context. The vulnerability has been fixed in jspdf@4.2.1. As a workaround, sanitize user input before passing it to the output method. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32608 | 1 Nicolargo | 1 Glances | 2026-03-24 | 7 High |
| Glances is an open-source system cross-platform monitoring tool. The Glances action system allows administrators to configure shell commands that execute when monitoring thresholds are exceeded. These commands support Mustache template variables (e.g., `{{name}}`, `{{key}}`) that are populated with runtime monitoring data. The `secure_popen()` function, which executes these commands, implements its own pipe, redirect, and chain operator handling by splitting the command string before passing each segment to `subprocess.Popen(shell=False)`. Prior to 4.5.2, when a Mustache-rendered value (such as a process name, filesystem mount point, or container name) contains pipe, redirect, or chain metacharacters, the rendered command is split in unintended ways, allowing an attacker who controls a process name or container name to inject arbitrary commands. Version 4.5.2 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22317 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 77 Fl Nat 2008, Fl Nat 2208, Fl Nat 2304-2gc-2sfp and 74 more | 2026-03-24 | 7.2 High |
| A command injection vulnerability in the device’s Root CA certificate transfer workflow allows a high-privileged attacker to send crafted HTTP POST requests that result in arbitrary command execution on the underlying Linux OS with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22322 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 77 Fl Nat 2008, Fl Nat 2208, Fl Nat 2304-2gc-2sfp and 74 more | 2026-03-24 | 7.1 High |
| A stored cross‑site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Link Aggregation configuration interface allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to create a trunk entry containing malicious HTML/JavaScript code. When the affected page is viewed, the injected script executes in the context of the victim’s browser, enabling unauthorized actions such as interface manipulation. The session cookie is secured by the httpOnly Flag. Therefore an attacker is not able to take over the session of an authenticated user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12518 | 1 Bee Content Design | 1 Befree Sdk | 2026-03-24 | N/A |
| beefree.io SDK is vulnerable to Stored XSS in Social Media icon URL parameter in email builder functionality. Malicious attacker can inject arbitrary HTML and JS into template, which will be rendered/executed when visiting preview page. However due to beefree's Content Security Policy not all payloads will execute successfully. This issue has been fixed in version 3.47.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32691 | 1 Canonical | 1 Juju | 2026-03-24 | 5.3 Medium |
| A race condition in the secrets management subsystem of Juju versions 3.0.0 through 3.6.18 allows an authenticated unit agent to claim ownership of a newly initialized secret. Between generating a Juju Secret ID and creating the secret's first revision, an attacker authenticated as another unit agent can claim ownership of a known secret. This leads to the attacking unit being able to read the content of the initial secret revision. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32693 | 1 Canonical | 1 Juju | 2026-03-24 | 8.8 High |
| In Juju from version 3.0.0 through 3.6.18, the authorization of the "secret-set" tool is not performed correctly, which allows a grantee to update the secret content, and can lead to reading or updating other secrets. When the "secret-set" tool logs an error in an exploitation attempt, the secret is still updated contrary to expectations, and the new value is visible to both the owner and the grantee. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3278 | 1 Opentext | 1 Zenworks Service Desk | 2026-03-24 | 6.1 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in OpenText™ ZENworks Service Desk allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript leading to unauthorized actions on behalf of the user.This issue affects ZENworks Service Desk: 25.2, 25.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64301 | 1 Canva | 1 Affinity | 2026-03-24 | 7.8 High |
| An out‑of‑bounds write vulnerability exists in the EMF functionality of Canva Affinity. By using a specially crafted EMF file, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to perform an out‑of‑bounds write, potentially leading to code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1376 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2026-03-24 | 7.5 High |
| IBM i 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service using failed authentication connections due to improper allocation of resources. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14031 | 1 Ibm | 2 Sterling B2b Integrator, Sterling File Gateway | 2026-03-24 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_1, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_1, and 6.2.2.0 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to send a specially crafted request that causes the application to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27811 | 1 Roxy-wi | 1 Roxy-wi | 2026-03-24 | 8.8 High |
| Roxy-WI is a web interface for managing Haproxy, Nginx, Apache and Keepalived servers. Prior to version 8.2.6.3, a command injection vulnerability exists in the `/config/compare/<service>/<server_ip>/show` endpoint, allowed authenticated users to execute arbitrary system commands on the app host. The vulnerability exists in `app/modules/config/config.py` on line 362, where user input is directly formatted in the template string that is eventually executed. Version 8.2.6.3 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30048 | 1 Developer.notchatbot | 1 Webchat | 2026-03-24 | 5.4 Medium |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the NotChatbot WebChat widget thru 1.4.4. User-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being stored and rendered in the chat conversation history. This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript code which is executed when the chat history is reloaded. The issue is reproducible across multiple independent implementations of the widget, indicating that the vulnerability resides in the product itself rather than in a specific website configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30695 | 1 Zucchetti | 1 Axess | 2026-03-24 | 6.1 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the web-based configuration interface of Zucchetti Axess access control devices, including XA4, X3/X3BIO, X4, X7, and XIO / i-door / i-door+. The vulnerability is caused by improper sanitization of user-supplied input in the dirBrowse parameter of the /file_manager.cgi endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30701 | 1 Shenzhen Yuner Yipu | 1 Wifi Extender Wdr201a | 2026-03-24 | 9.1 Critical |
| The web interface of the WiFi Extender WDR201A (HW V2.1, FW LFMZX28040922V1.02) contains hardcoded credential disclosure mechanisms (in the form of Server Side Include) within multiple server-side web pages, including login.shtml and settings.shtml. These pages embed server-side execution directives that dynamically retrieve and expose the web administration password from non-volatile memory at runtime. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30703 | 1 Shenzhen Yuner Yipu | 1 Wdr201a | 2026-03-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| A command injection vulnerability exists in the web management interface of the WiFi Extender WDR201A (HW V2.1, FW LFMZX28040922V1.02). The adm.cgi endpoint improperly sanitizes user-supplied input provided to a command-related parameter in the sysCMD functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26740 | 2 Giflib, Giflib Project | 2 Giflib, Giflib | 2026-03-24 | 8.2 High |
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in giflib v.5.2.2 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the EGifGCBToExtension overwriting an existing Graphic Control Extension block without validating its allocated size. | ||||
| CVE-2026-29859 | 1 Aapanel | 1 Aapanel | 2026-03-24 | 9.8 Critical |
| An arbitrary file upload vulnerability in aaPanel v7.57.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via uploading a crafted file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27979 | 1 Vercel | 1 Next.js | 2026-03-24 | 7.5 High |
| Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 16.0.1 and prior to version 16.1.7, a request containing the `next-resume: 1` header (corresponding with a PPR resume request) would buffer request bodies without consistently enforcing `maxPostponedStateSize` in certain setups. The previous mitigation protected minimal-mode deployments, but equivalent non-minimal deployments remained vulnerable to the same unbounded postponed resume-body buffering behavior. In applications using the App Router with Partial Prerendering capability enabled (via `experimental.ppr` or `cacheComponents`), an attacker could send oversized `next-resume` POST payloads that were buffered without consistent size enforcement in non-minimal deployments, causing excessive memory usage and potential denial of service. This is fixed in version 16.1.7 by enforcing size limits across all postponed-body buffering paths and erroring when limits are exceeded. If upgrading is not immediately possible, block requests containing the `next-resume` header, as this is never valid to be sent from an untrusted client. | ||||