Export limit exceeded: 376152 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 376152 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (376152 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-76073 | 1 Humansignal | 1 Label Studio | 2026-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Label Studio does not scope the annotation detail endpoint to the requesting user's organization. AnnotationAPI in label_studio/tasks/api.py declares queryset = Annotation.objects.all() and provides no get_queryset override, so the default lookup retrieves any annotation by primary key. The view's permission_required entries name annotations.view, annotations.change and annotations.delete, and label_studio/core/permissions.py registers every permission with rules.is_authenticated, so the check is satisfied by any logged-in account and no object-level organization test runs. The sibling task endpoint does constrain its queryset with project__organization set to the requester's active organization, which is the boundary this path omits. Annotation identifiers are sequential integers, so an authenticated user of one organization can enumerate identifiers to read, modify and delete annotations belonging to other organizations on the same instance. The same unscoped queryset appears on AnnotationConvertAPI in the same file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72698 | 1 Getgrav | 1 Grav | 2026-08-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Grav CMS before 2.0.16 fails to filter system, site, and theme configuration arrays in sandboxed Twig renders, allowing content editors to read sensitive configuration values. Attackers with page-content edit access can access raw configuration arrays including secrets like cache credentials by using dot notation in Twig templates, bypassing the config_denied_paths restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71943 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the setDevNet function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71938 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the switch_lan_gvrp function. The vulnerability is caused by unsafe copying of the portList field into an undersized buffer. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71933 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-26 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain unauthorized operation vulnerabilities in multiple syslog functions. The vulnerability is caused by missing authorization checks. A remote attacker can trigger these vulnerabilities via crafted requests to modify configuration, restart services, save startup configuration, or clear logs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71928 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the fdftDevice function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71923 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the auth_set function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71918 | 1 Draytek | 14 Vigorswitch Fx2120 Firmware, Vigorswitch G1282 Firmware, Vigorswitch G2100 Firmware and 11 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the webBackupAction function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the option, key, pw_encode, pathN, and valueN fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71913 | 1 Draytek | 12 Vigorap 1060c, Vigorap 1060c Firmware, Vigorap 903 and 9 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the upload_settings.cgi interface. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering before the restorekey field is concatenated into a shell command. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71908 | 1 Draytek | 12 Vigorap 1060c, Vigorap 1060c Firmware, Vigorap 903 and 9 more | 2026-08-26 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the mesh_start_speed_test function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient sanitization of the meshdevice_index and meshdevice_ip fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71511 | 1 Dolibarr | 1 Dolibarr | 2026-08-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains a sensitive data exposure vulnerability in the Members REST API that allows authenticated attackers with member-read rights to retrieve bcrypt password verifiers by querying member endpoints. Attackers can call the individual member or member list endpoints to obtain crypted password verifier fields that are not filtered by the base API serializer or the Members API class, potentially enabling offline password cracking attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71506 | 1 Dolibarr | 1 Dolibarr | 2026-08-26 | 8.1 High |
| Dolibarr before 24.0.0 contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the payments REST API delete endpoint that allows authenticated attackers with invoice-deletion rights to permanently delete any payment record by bypassing the intended payment-issuance rights check. Attackers can exploit this misconfigured permission check to zero paid amounts on invoices and remove entries from accounting exports, causing financial data integrity loss. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68767 | 1 Hashcat | 1 Hashcat | 2026-08-26 | 6.1 Medium |
| hashcat's fgetl() function in src/filehandling.c writes a null terminator one byte past the caller's buffer when an input line is exactly the buffer length. Attackers can trigger this out-of-bounds heap write by providing a hash file, potfile, or wordlist containing a line of exactly HCBUFSIZ_LARGE bytes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65088 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Nemoclaw | 2026-08-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| NVIDIA NemoClaw contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause invocation of process using visible sensitive information. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5388 | 1 Emilstenstrom | 1 Justhtml | 2026-08-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| justhtml before 1.15.0 contains multiple security issues in URL sanitization helpers (clean_url_value/clean_url_in_js_string), HTML serialization, Markdown passthrough (html_passthrough=True), and several custom sanitization-policy edge cases. Depending on configuration, an attacker can bypass sanitization to inject active HTML and JavaScript — for example via encoded javascript: URLs, backslash-based relative URLs resolved as remote hosts, markup-breaking programmatic element/attribute names or HTML comments, raw </textarea> reintroduction through Markdown passthrough, or preserved <style>/<meta http-equiv=refresh>/<base href> tags in custom policies. Most custom-policy issues do not affect the default sanitize=True configuration; they primarily affect helper APIs, programmatic DOM construction, html_passthrough=True, and custom policies/transform pipelines. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59809 | 2 B3log, Siyuan | 2 Siyuan, Siyuan | 2026-08-26 | 4.9 Medium |
| SiYuan before v3.8.0 interpolates secret placeholders into the destination URL parameter of the http_request MCP tool, allowing attackers to exfiltrate stored secrets. An MCP client can craft a request with an attacker-controlled URL containing secret placeholders to send plaintext secret values to any public host without confirmation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58001 | 1 Wwbn | 1 Avideo | 2026-08-26 | 5.7 Medium |
| WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in objects/videoEditLight.php that lacks request authenticity checks and accepts GET requests. Attackers can store an img tag in a video description that transfers video ownership to an attacker-controlled account when an administrator views the video page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56709 | 1 Getgrav | 1 Grav | 2026-08-26 | 7.5 High |
| Grav before 3.9.2 fails to validate untrusted Host headers in the sendInvitationEmail() function when constructing token-bearing invitation links. Attackers can manipulate the Host header to poison invitation links and redirect users to attacker-controlled domains, bypassing the require_trusted_host protection which only covers password reset flows. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56704 | 2 Adminer, Vrana | 2 Adminer, Adminer | 2026-08-26 | 6.1 Medium |
| Adminer before 5.4.3 inserts unsanitized database server version strings into script tags with valid CSP nonces without proper validation. Attackers controlling a rogue MySQL server can return crafted version strings that break out of the JavaScript context and execute arbitrary code, bypassing Content Security Policy protections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48388 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Photoshop Installer, Photoshop Installer | 2026-08-26 | 8.6 High |
| Adobe Photoshop Installer was affected by an Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability that could have resulted in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could have exploited this vulnerability by placing a malicious library in a directory searched by the installer. Exploitation of this issue required user interaction in that a victim must have been running the installer. Scope is changed. | ||||