Export limit exceeded: 86917 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (86917 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-48257 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Cloud Service | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48255 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Cloud Service | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48262 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Cloud Service | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48253 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Cloud Service | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48261 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Cloud Service | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48355 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Cloud Service | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48260 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Cloud Service | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48263 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Cloud Service | 2026-08-05 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50651 | 3 Apple, Linux, Microsoft | 7 Macos, Linux Kernel, .net and 4 more | 2026-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12898 | 2 Wordpress, Yaniiliev | 2 Wordpress, All In One Wp Migration And Backup | 2026-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| The All-in-One WP Migration and Backup WordPress plugin before 7.106 does not properly sanitise a user-supplied value before using it to build a file path, allowing unauthenticated attackers to create or append a log file in arbitrary locations outside its intended storage directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69185 | 1 Socket | 1 Socket.io | 2026-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| Socket.IO enables bidirectional and low-latency communication for every platform. Prior to 4.2.7, 3.4.5, and 3.3.6, a specially crafted Socket.IO packet can make the server wait for a large number of binary attachments and buffer them, which can be exploited to make the server run out of memory. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.7, 3.4.5, and 3.3.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14824 | 2 Quizandsurveymaster, Wordpress | 2 Quiz And Survey Master, Wordpress | 2026-08-05 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Quiz and Survey Master (QSM) WordPress plugin before 11.2.2 does not properly escape a question setting before outputting it into an unquoted HTML attribute, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the browser of any user viewing the affected quiz. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15233 | 2 Nested Pages Project, Wordpress | 2 Nested Pages, Wordpress | 2026-08-05 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Nested Pages WordPress plugin before 3.2.15 does not properly escape post titles before outputting them into HTML attributes on an administrative listing screen, allowing users with the Editor role (or Contributor/Author when the Nested Pages WordPress plugin before 3.2.15 is enabled for the post type) to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the session of any higher-privileged user who views that screen. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16293 | 2 Blubrry, Wordpress | 2 Powerpress Podcasting Plugin By Blubrry, Wordpress | 2026-08-05 | 6.8 Medium |
| The PowerPress Podcasting plugin by Blubrry WordPress plugin before 11.16.11 does not sanitise and escape some of its Podcast Episode settings, which could allow users with a role as low as Contributor to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66275 | 1 Apache | 1 Qpid Proton-j | 2026-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| An authenticated attacker could exceed the session flow control incoming window potentially leading to denial of service. This issue affects Apache Qpid Proton-J: through 0.34.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.35.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66274 | 1 Apache | 1 Qpid Proton-j | 2026-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| A pre-authentication attacker could leverage type nesting to cause a StackOverflowError potentially leading to denial of service. This issue affects Apache Qpid Proton-J: through 0.34.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.35.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68060 | 1 Apache | 1 Qpid Broker-j | 2026-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| A pre-authentication attacker could leverage type size/count handling to cause excessive allocation leading to potential denial of service. This issue affects Apache Qpid Broker-J: through 10.0.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.1.0, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68494 | 1 Fasterxml | 1 Jackson-core | 2026-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| The fix released in jackson-core 2.18.6 and 2.21.1 for CVE-2026-18401 (GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq, number length constraint bypass in the non-blocking parser) is incomplete. This record covers the remaining bypass. The earlier fix wired validateIntegerLength() into a new _setIntLength() helper and invoked it wherever the integer portion of a number is decided: a terminator byte arrives, a '.' or 'e'/'E' is seen, or input ends inside a fully buffered value. It was not invoked on the attacker-relevant path where the parser runs out of input while still inside the MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS minor state and returns NOT_AVAILABLE to the caller. As a result, an attacker who streams JSON to a non-blocking parser in many small chunks, without ever sending a terminator byte, keeps the parser inside MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS indefinitely. _textBuffer.expandCurrentSegment() grows the accumulator on every chunk while validateIntegerLength() is never called. The accumulator is bounded only by maxStringLength (20 MiB by default) rather than by maxNumberLength (1000 by default), an amplification of roughly 20,000x over the documented limit. Because Java char values occupy two bytes, a single connection can be driven to approximately 40 MiB of heap before the validator finally fires when the value completes. The equivalent fraction-path code is correct: _finishFloatFraction() calls _setFractLength() before its NOT_AVAILABLE return. The missing call affects the integer-digit paths in _startPositiveNumber(), _startNegativeNumber() and _finishNumberIntegralPart() in NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase. Impact: reactive frameworks such as Spring WebFlux/Reactor, Quarkus, Helidon and Vert.x feed inbound HTTP or gRPC bytes to the async parser as they arrive, which is precisely the chunked-feed shape required. Operators who set StreamReadConstraints.maxNumberLength expecting it to cap memory per number value do not get that guarantee; memory accumulates per concurrent connection and attacker-controlled concurrency can exhaust the JVM heap. The synchronous parsers (UTF8StreamJsonParser, ReaderBasedJsonParser) and the async parser operating on complete input are not affected. Exploitation requires only the ability to stream data to a parsing endpoint; no privileges or user interaction are needed. This issue affects com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core from version 2.15.0 through 2.18.7, and from 2.19.0 through 2.21.3, and tools.jackson.core:jackson-core from 3.0.0 through 3.1.3. Versions prior to 2.15.0 are not affected, because StreamReadConstraints -- which defines the maxNumberLength setting -- was first introduced in jackson-core 2.15.0, so no such constraint exists to be bypassed in earlier releases. Note that GHSA-r7wm-3cxj-wff9 states the affected 2.x range without a lower bound. The 2.22.x and 3.2.x release lines are not affected: those branches were created after the fix commit landed on 2026-05-21 and therefore contain it from their initial releases (2.22.0, tagged 2026-06-03, and 3.2.0, tagged 2026-06-08). | ||||
| CVE-2026-35072 | 1 Dell | 3 Data Domain Operating System, Powerprotect Data Domain, Powerprotect Dp Series Appliance | 2026-08-05 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.6.0.0 and version 8.7.0.0, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.20, and LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.60 contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35074 | 1 Dell | 3 Data Domain Operating System, Powerprotect Data Domain, Powerprotect Dp Series Appliance | 2026-08-05 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.6.0.0 and version 8.7.0.0, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.20, and LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.60 contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command Injection vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges. | ||||