Export limit exceeded: 88023 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (88023 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-53427 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Chibueze Okechukwu SEO Pyramid seo-pyramid allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects SEO Pyramid: from n/a through <= 1.9.8. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54884 | 1 Vision Ui Project | 1 Vision Ui | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Vision UI is a collection of enterprise-grade, dependency-free modules for modern web projects. In versions 1.4.0 and below, the generateSecureId and getSecureRandomInt functions in security-kit versions prior to 3.5.0 (packaged in Vision UI 1.4.0 and below) are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks. The generateSecureId(length) function directly used the length parameter to size a Uint8Array buffer, allowing attackers to exhaust server memory through repeated requests for large IDs since the previous 1024 limit was insufficient. The getSecureRandomInt(min, max) function calculated buffer size based on the range between min and max, where large ranges caused excessive memory allocation and CPU-intensive rejection-sampling loops that could hang the thread. This issue is fixed in version 1.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54881 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Mermaid is a JavaScript based diagramming and charting tool that uses Markdown-inspired text definitions and a renderer to create and modify complex diagrams. In the default configuration of mermaid 10.9.0-rc.1 to 11.9.0, user supplied input for sequence diagram labels is passed to innerHTML during calculation of element size, causing XSS. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53472 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| WRC-BE36QS-B and WRC-W701-B contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in WebGUI. If exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by a remote attacker who can log in to WebGUI. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54872 | 1 Onion-site-template Project | 1 Onion-site-template | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| onion-site-template is a complete, scalable tor hidden service self-hosting sample. Versions which include commit 3196bd89 contain a baked-in tor image if the secrets were copied from an existing onion domain. A website could be compromised if a user shared the baked-in image, or if someone were able to acquire access to the user's device outside of a containerized environment. This is fixed by commit bc9ba0fd. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54857 | 1 Seiko-sol | 1 Skybridge Basic Mb-a130 | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') issue exists in SkyBridge BASIC MB-A130 Ver.1.5.8 and earlier. If exploited, a remote unauthenticated attacker may execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54856 | 1 Six Apart | 1 Movable Type | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Movable Type contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in Edit ContentData page. If crafted input is stored by an attacker with "ContentType Management" privilege, an arbitrary script may be executed on the web browser of the user who accesses Edit ContentData page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54859 | 1 Neojapan | 1 Desknet Neo | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in desknet's NEO V9.0R2.0 and earlier allow execution of arbitrary JavaScript in a user’s web browser. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40570 | 1 Siemens | 1 Siprotec 5 | 2026-04-15 | 2.4 Low |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V10.0). Affected devices do not properly limit the bandwidth for incoming network packets over their local USB port. This could allow an attacker with physical access to send specially crafted packets with high bandwidth to the affected devices thus forcing them to exhaust their memory and stop responding to any network traffic via the local USB port. Affected devices reset themselves automatically after a successful attack. The protection function is not affected of this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54811 | 1 Openplcproject | 2 Openplc V3, Openplc V3 Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| OpenPLC_V3 has a vulnerability in the enipThread function that occurs due to the lack of a return value. This leads to a crash when the server loop ends and execution hits an illegal ud2 instruction. This issue can be triggered remotely without authentication by starting the same server multiple times or if the server exits unexpectedly. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) against the PLC runtime, stopping any PC started remotely without authentication. This results in the PLC process crashing and halting all automation or control logic managed by OpenPLC. | ||||
| CVE-2025-56605 | 1 Puneethreddyhc | 1 Event Management System | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the register.php backend script of PuneethReddyHC Event Management System 1.0. The mobile POST parameter is improperly validated and echoed back in the HTTP response without sanitization, allowing an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the victim's browser. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11042 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| In invoke-ai/invokeai version v5.0.2, the web API `POST /api/v1/images/delete` is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Deletion. This vulnerability allows unauthorized attackers to delete arbitrary files on the server, potentially including critical or sensitive system files such as SSH keys, SQLite databases, and configuration files. This can impact the integrity and availability of applications relying on these files. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54546 | 1 Arista | 1 Danz Monitoring Fabric | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| On affected platforms, restricted users could use SSH port forwarding to access host-internal services | ||||
| CVE-2025-54545 | 1 Arista | 1 Danz Monitoring Fabric | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| On affected platforms, a restricted user could break out of the CLI sandbox to the system shell and elevate their privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53478 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The CheckUser extension’s Special:Investigate interface is vulnerable to reflected XSS due to improper escaping of certain internationalized system messages rendered on the “IPs and User agents” tab. This issue affects Mediawiki - CheckUser extension: from 1.39.X before 1.39.13, from 1.42.X before 1.42.7, from 1.43.X before 1.43.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53479 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The CheckUser extension’s Special:CheckUser interface is vulnerable to reflected XSS via the rev-deleted-user message. This message is rendered without proper escaping, making it possible to inject JavaScript through the uselang=x-xss language override mechanism. This issue affects Mediawiki - CheckUser extension: from 1.42.X before 1.42.7, from 1.43.X before 1.43.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53480 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The CheckUser extension’s Special:Investigate page has a vulnerability in the Account information tab, where specific internationalized messages are rendered without proper escaping. Attackers can exploit this by appending ?uselang=x-xss to the URL, causing reflected XSS when the UI renders affected message keys. This issue affects Mediawiki - CheckUser extension: from 1.39.X before 1.39.13, from 1.42.X before 1.42.7, from 1.43.X before 1.43.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54476 | 1 Joomla | 2 Joomla, Joomla! | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper handling of input could lead to an XSS vector in the checkAttribute method of the input filter framework class. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53482 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - IPInfo Extension allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Mediawiki - IPInfo Extension: from 1.39.X before 1.39.13, from 1.42.X before 1.42.7, from 1.43.X before 1.43.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54469 | 1 Suse | 1 Neuvector | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical |
| A vulnerability was identified in NeuVector, where the enforcer used environment variables CLUSTER_RPC_PORT and CLUSTER_LAN_PORT to generate a command to be executed via popen, without first sanitising their values. The entry process of the enforcer container is the monitor process. When the enforcer container stops, the monitor process checks whether the consul subprocess has exited. To perform this check, the monitor process uses the popen function to execute a shell command that determines whether the ports used by the consul subprocess are still active. The values of environment variables CLUSTER_RPC_PORT and CLUSTER_LAN_PORT are used directly to compose shell commands via popen without validation or sanitization. This behavior could allow a malicious user to inject malicious commands through these variables within the enforcer container. | ||||