Export limit exceeded: 86760 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (86760 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-19015 | 1 Hashicorp | 2 Consul, Consul Enterprise | 2026-08-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| Consul Community Edition and Consul Enterprise 1.2.0 through 2.0.2 are vulnerable to an uncontrolled resource consumption issue in the Connect CA roots endpoint that may allow a remote caller to grow the agent's Connect CA roots cache without bound, defeating the operator's cache-disable configuration. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-19015, is fixed in Consul 2.0.3 and Consul Enterprise 1.21.17, 1.22.11, and 2.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19014 | 1 Hashicorp | 2 Consul, Consul Enterprise | 2026-08-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| Consul Community Edition and Consul Enterprise 1.17.0 through 2.0.2 are vulnerable to an uncontrolled resource consumption issue in the Connect authorization endpoint that may allow a caller to grow the agent's intention-match cache without bound, defeating the operator's cache-disable configuration. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-190124, is fixed in Consul 2.0.3 and Consul Enterprise 1.21.17, 1.22.11, and 2.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15972 | 1 Hashicorp | 2 Consul, Consul Enterprise | 2026-08-10 | 7.5 High |
| Consul Community Edition and Consul Enterprise 1.13.0 through 2.0.2 are vulnerable to an unauthenticated denial of service through unbounded connection acceptance on the external gRPC listeners. A remote attacker may exhaust agent file descriptors, goroutines, and memory by opening many incomplete connections, potentially preventing legitimate clients from connecting. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-15972, is fixed in Consul 2.0.3 and Consul Enterprise 1.21.17, 1.22.11, and 2.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17010 | 2026-08-10 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The Saitama Addon Pack WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not sanitise and escape certain post metadata values before outputting them, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to inject stored Cross-Site Scripting payloads that execute in the browser of a higher-privileged user who reviews the content. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13079 | 1 Watchguard | 42 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 39 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| A local privilege escalation vulnerability in the WatchGuard Mobile VPN with SSL client for Windows allows a local attacker to escalate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on the machine where the client is installed. This issue affects the Mobile VPN with SSL client for Windows up to and including 2026.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13701 | 2026-08-10 | 4.8 Medium | ||
| The Advanced Excerpt WordPress plugin before 4.5 does not sanitise and escape one of its settings before outputting it on the front end of the site, which could allow administrators (including those without the unfiltered_html capability, such as on multisite) to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks that execute in the context of any visitor viewing affected pages. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13728 | 1 Watchguard | 38 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 35 more | 2026-08-10 | 4.4 Medium |
| In exception circumstances, WatchGuard Fireware OS on a FireCluster may use a hard-coded encryption key to encrypt saved credentials for Access Portal resources. This vulnerability does not affect devices that do not support the Access Portal feature or standalone Fireboxes not deployed in a FireCluster. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16535 | 2 Link Library Project, Wordpress | 2 Link Library, Wordpress | 2026-08-10 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.4 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before reflecting it back in a response, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform Reflected Cross-Site Scripting attacks against users who can be tricked into performing an action. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68241 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-10 | 4.6 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/i915/mst: limit DP MST ESI service loop The loop in intel_dp_check_mst_status() keeps servicing interrupts originating from the sink without bound. Add an upper bound to the new interrupts occurring during interrupt processing to not get stuck on potentially stuck sink devices. Use arbitrary 32 tries to clear incoming interrupts in one go. Discovered using AI-assisted static analysis confirmed by Intel Product Security. Note: The condition likely pre-dates the commit in the Fixes: tag, but this is about as far back as a backport has any chance of succeeding. Before that, the retry had a goto. (cherry picked from commit b4ea5272133059acb493cc36599071a9e852ec2e) | ||||
| CVE-2026-68167 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: do not try compression for data reloc inodes [BUG] There is a syzbot report that the check inside get_new_location() triggered: BTRFS info (device loop0): found 31 extents, stage: move data extents BTRFS info (device loop0): leaf 8908800 gen 16 total ptrs 28 free space 1676 owner 18446744073709551607 item 0 key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 3835 itemsize 160 inode generation 5 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 0 block group 0 mode 40755 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 0 flags 0x0 atime 1669132761.0 ctime 1669132761.0 mtime 1669132761.0 otime 0.0 item 1 key (256 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 3823 itemsize 12 index 0 name_len 2 item 2 key (258 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 3663 itemsize 160 inode generation 1 transid 16 size 733184 nbytes 106496 block group 0 mode 100600 links 0 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 24 flags 0x18 item 3 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 3595 itemsize 68 generation 16 type 0 inline extent data size 47 ram_bytes 4096 compression 1 [...] item 27 key (18446744073709551611 ORPHAN_ITEM 258) itemoff 2376 itemsize 0 BTRFS error (device loop0): unexpected non-zero offset in file extent item for data reloc inode 258 key offset 0 offset 9277520992061368337 ------------[ cut here ]------------ btrfs_abort_should_print_stack(__error) [CAUSE] The above dump tree shows the first file extent item is inlined, which should make no sense for data reloc inodes, as such inodes just represent where the data extents are in the relocation destination chunk. However the relocation path preallocates space for each block, then dirties them, cluster by cluster. It's possible to have a single block at the beginning of the block group, and no other block in the same cluster. So relocation will preallocate a file extent for that block and dirty the first block. Then memory pressure forces the data reloc inode to be written back, before any other blocks are dirtied/allocated. Finally commit 3eaf5f082c4c ("btrfs: extract inlined creation into a dedicated delalloc helper") changed the sequence of delalloc. Before that commit we always tried NOCOW first, so that dirtied block would be written back into the preallocated space, and appear as a regular extent. But with that commit, we always try inline first, and since compression is forced, we try compressing the first block, and then inline the compressed data, resulting in the above inlined file extent in the data reloc tree. Then the check in get_new_location() will check the file offset, without checking if the file extent is inlined or not, resulting in the above failure. [FIX] Do not allow compression for data reloc inodes. Since data reloc inode sizes are always block aligned, as long as we do not compress, @data_len will always be at least one block, and that will cause can_cow_file_range_inline() to return false, thus no inlined extent will be created. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68225 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-10 | N/A |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: i2c: alvium: fix critical pointer access in alvium_ctrl_init The current implementation of alvium_ctrl_init creates several controls in function alvium_ctrl_init and uses the returned pointer without check. That can cause write access over NULL-pointer for several controls. The reworked code checks the pointers before adding flags. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13505 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-fja | 2026-08-10 | N/A |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series), sensitive key material held by the AES and DESede engines, the SP 800-90A DRBGs, SymmetricSecretKey and the PBKD and scrypt parameter classes was zeroised on garbage collection by overriding Object.finalize. Finalization runs at an unspecified time and in an unspecified order and is serviced by a single finalizer thread, so where objects carrying a finalizer are allocated faster than that thread retires them the pending-finalization queue grows without bound: disposal falls arbitrarily far behind, which can contribute to an OutOfMemoryError under load, and the key material those objects hold stays resident in the heap for as long as they are queued, defeating the purpose of the zeroisation. The behaviour was not a problem on Java 8 or Java 11; it is later JVMs, on which finalization has been deprecated and progressively de-emphasised, where it becomes one. Disposal of these classes now runs from a java.lang.ref.Cleaner registered in the multi-release jdk1.9 overlay, so on Java 9 and later it no longer depends on the finalizer being scheduled. Bouncy Castle for Java (bcprov) and Bouncy Castle for Java LTS are not affected, as neither implements the finalizer-based zeroisation scheme. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13384 | 1 Watchguard | 40 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 37 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.2 High |
| An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS wgagent process could allow an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted requests to the Management Web UI. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13383 | 1 Watchguard | 40 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 37 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.2 High |
| An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS ikestubd process could allow an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted requests to the Management Web UI. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13377 | 1 Watchguard | 40 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 37 more | 2026-08-10 | 4.8 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS SIP Proxy module allows Stored XSS. This vulnerability is an additional unmitigated attack path for CVE-2025-6947. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13376 | 1 Watchguard | 40 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 37 more | 2026-08-10 | 4.8 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS spamBlocker module allows Stored XSS. This vulnerability is an additional unmitigated attack path for CVE-2025-1071. This issue affects Fireware OS 12.0 up to and including 12.12, 12.5 up to and including 12.5.18, and 2025.1 up to and including 2026.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13373 | 1 Watchguard | 40 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 37 more | 2026-08-10 | 4.8 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS (Tigerpaw Technology Integration module) allows Stored XSS. This vulnerability is an additional unmitigated attack path for CVE-2025-13936. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13374 | 1 Watchguard | 40 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 37 more | 2026-08-10 | 4.8 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS (ConnectWise Technology Integration module) allows Stored XSS. This vulnerability is an additional unmitigated attack path for CVE-2025-13937. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13375 | 1 Watchguard | 40 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 37 more | 2026-08-10 | 4.8 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS (Autotask Technology Integration module) allows Stored XSS. This vulnerability is an additional unmitigated attack path for CVE-2025-13938. This issue affects Fireware OS 12.4 up to and including 12.12, 12.5 up to and including 12.5.18, and 2025.1 up to and including 2026.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41288 | 1 Watchguard | 3 Agent, Single Watchguard Agent, Watchguard Agent | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Incorrect permission assignment for a resource in the patch management component of the WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows an authenticated local user to elevate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM. | ||||