Search Results (676 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2008-1232 2 Apache, Redhat 7 Tomcat, Certificate System, Enterprise Linux and 4 more 2026-04-23 N/A
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.37, 5.5.0 through 5.5.26, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.16 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted string that is used in the message argument to the HttpServletResponse.sendError method.
CVE-2008-2938 2 Apache, Redhat 6 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 3 more 2026-04-23 N/A
Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.37, 5.5.0 through 5.5.26, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.16, when allowLinking and UTF-8 are enabled, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via encoded directory traversal sequences in the URI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2370. NOTE: versions earlier than 6.0.18 were reported affected, but the vendor advisory lists 6.0.16 as the last affected version.
CVE-2010-1428 1 Redhat 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2026-04-22 7.5 High
The Web Console (aka web-console) in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via an unspecified request that uses a different method.
CVE-2010-0738 1 Redhat 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2026-04-22 5.3 Medium
The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to send requests to this application's GET handler by using a different method.
CVE-2010-1871 2 Netapp, Redhat 5 Oncommand Balance, Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Unified Manager and 2 more 2026-04-22 8.8 High
JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured.
CVE-2017-12149 1 Redhat 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 2026-04-21 9.8 Critical
In Jboss Application Server as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 5.2, it was found that the doFilter method in the ReadOnlyAccessFilter of the HTTP Invoker does not restrict classes for which it performs deserialization and thus allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data.
CVE-2026-1190 1 Redhat 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp and 1 more 2026-04-18 3.1 Low
A flaw was found in Keycloak's SAML brokering functionality. When Keycloak is configured as a client in a Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) setup, it fails to validate the `NotOnOrAfter` timestamp within the `SubjectConfirmationData`. This allows an attacker to delay the expiration of SAML responses, potentially extending the time a response is considered valid and leading to unexpected session durations or resource consumption.
CVE-2026-0976 1 Redhat 3 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp 2026-04-18 3.7 Low
A flaw was found in Keycloak. This improper input validation vulnerability occurs because Keycloak accepts RFC-compliant matrix parameters in URL path segments, while common reverse proxy configurations may ignore or mishandle them. A remote attacker can craft requests to mask path segments, potentially bypassing proxy-level path filtering. This could expose administrative or sensitive endpoints that operators believe are not externally reachable.
CVE-2026-2733 1 Redhat 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more 2026-04-16 3.8 Low
A flaw was identified in the Docker v2 authentication endpoint of Keycloak, where tokens continue to be issued even after a Docker registry client has been administratively disabled. This means that turning the client “Enabled” setting to OFF does not fully prevent access. As a result, previously valid credentials can still be used to obtain authentication tokens. This weakens administrative controls and could allow unintended access to container registry resources.
CVE-2026-0871 1 Redhat 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more 2026-04-16 4.9 Medium
A flaw was found in Keycloak. An administrator with `manage-users` permission can bypass the "Only administrators can view" setting for unmanaged attributes, allowing them to modify these attributes. This improper access control can lead to unauthorized changes to user profiles, even when the system is configured to restrict such modifications.
CVE-2026-3009 1 Redhat 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more 2026-04-16 8.1 High
A security flaw in the IdentityBrokerService.performLogin endpoint of Keycloak allows authentication to proceed using an Identity Provider (IdP) even after it has been disabled by an administrator. An attacker who knows the IdP alias can reuse a previously generated login request to bypass the administrative restriction. This undermines access control enforcement and may allow unauthorized authentication through a disabled external provider.
CVE-2026-1035 1 Redhat 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp and 1 more 2026-04-16 3.1 Low
A flaw was found in the Keycloak server during refresh token processing, specifically in the TokenManager class responsible for enforcing refresh token reuse policies. When strict refresh token rotation is enabled, the validation and update of refresh token usage are not performed atomically. This allows concurrent refresh requests to bypass single-use enforcement and issue multiple access tokens from the same refresh token. As a result, Keycloak’s refresh token rotation hardening can be undermined.
CVE-2026-3121 2 Keycloak, Redhat 8 Keycloak, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak and 5 more 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
A flaw was found in Keycloak. An administrator with `manage-clients` permission can exploit a misconfiguration where this permission is equivalent to `manage-permissions`. This allows the administrator to escalate privileges and gain control over roles, users, or other administrative functions within the realm. This privilege escalation can occur when admin permissions are enabled at the realm level.
CVE-2026-1180 1 Redhat 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp and 1 more 2026-04-15 5.8 Medium
A flaw was identified in Keycloak’s OpenID Connect Dynamic Client Registration feature when clients authenticate using private_key_jwt. The issue allows a client to specify an arbitrary jwks_uri, which Keycloak then retrieves without validating the destination. This enables attackers to coerce the Keycloak server into making HTTP requests to internal or restricted network resources. As a result, attackers can probe internal services and cloud metadata endpoints, creating an information disclosure and reconnaissance risk.
CVE-2024-1023 1 Redhat 20 A Mq Clients, Amq Broker, Amq Streams and 17 more 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
A vulnerability in the Eclipse Vert.x toolkit results in a memory leak due to using Netty FastThreadLocal data structures. Specifically, when the Vert.x HTTP client establishes connections to different hosts, triggering the memory leak. The leak can be accelerated with intimate runtime knowledge, allowing an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. For instance, a server accepting arbitrary internet addresses could serve as an attack vector by connecting to these addresses, thereby accelerating the memory leak.
CVE-2025-14969 1 Redhat 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp, Openshift Devspaces and 1 more 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
A flaw was found in Hibernate Reactive. When an HTTP endpoint is exposed to perform database operations, a remote client can prematurely close the HTTP connection. This action may lead to leaking connections from the database connection pool, potentially causing a Denial of Service (DoS) by exhausting available database connections.
CVE-2024-1249 1 Redhat 15 Amq Broker, Amq Streams, Build Keycloak and 12 more 2026-04-15 7.4 High
A flaw was found in Keycloak's OIDC component in the "checkLoginIframe," which allows unvalidated cross-origin messages. This flaw allows attackers to coordinate and send millions of requests in seconds using simple code, significantly impacting the application's availability without proper origin validation for incoming messages.
CVE-2024-12397 1 Redhat 13 Amq Streams, Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Keycloak and 10 more 2026-04-15 7.4 High
A flaw was found in Quarkus-HTTP, which incorrectly parses cookies with certain value-delimiting characters in incoming requests. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a cookie value to exfiltrate HttpOnly cookie values or spoof arbitrary additional cookie values, leading to unauthorized data access or modification. The main threat from this flaw impacts data confidentiality and integrity.
CVE-2024-8698 1 Redhat 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Red Hat Single Sign On and 1 more 2026-04-15 7.7 High
A flaw exists in the SAML signature validation method within the Keycloak XMLSignatureUtil class. The method incorrectly determines whether a SAML signature is for the full document or only for specific assertions based on the position of the signature in the XML document, rather than the Reference element used to specify the signed element. This flaw allows attackers to create crafted responses that can bypass the validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation or impersonation attacks.
CVE-2024-10973 1 Redhat 3 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp 2026-04-15 5.7 Medium
A vulnerability was found in Keycloak. The environment option `KC_CACHE_EMBEDDED_MTLS_ENABLED` does not work and the JGroups replication configuration is always used in plain text which can allow an attacker that has access to adjacent networks related to JGroups to read sensitive information.