| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The payment integration pretix-oppwa provides support
for the payment providers VR Payment, Hobex, and potentially others
based on Oppwa's technology. The integration of Oppwa, following their
official documentation, includes a step where the user is redirected
from the payment provider back to our system with a query parameter like
?resourcePath=/v1/checkouts/{checkoutId}/payment in the URL. Our system is then supposed to fetch the status of the transaction from the URL given by baseUrl + resourcePath.
Our plugin pretix-oppwa did so insecurely by
concatenating the parameter form the URL to the base domain of the API
without further validation and, critically, without a / at the end of the baseUrl. Therefore, an attacker could inject a resourcePath argument in a way that causes pretix to call a different
server instead. Since the request includes the access token (API key)
of the Oppwa account, this would leak the access token, giving access to
data contained in the payment provider's system. This is fixed with the
release today by strictly validating the given API URL.
After installing the update, we recommend asking your payment provider for a new access token and updating it in pretix. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands and read sensitive files including credentials, enabling complete system compromise and lateral movement. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows an attacker to read every secret available to the Langflow process, read and modify every flow, conversation, message, file upload, and saved component in the Langflow database, can connect to internal services, abuse cloud metadata endpoints, laterally move to other tenants on the same Langflow instance, and Establish persistence by modifying the public flow's `tool_code` so normal `/api/v1/build/...` calls by any user re-execute attacker code at each build. |
| IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.4 is vulnerable to remote code execution due to improper pre-auth DRDA handshake handling. |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks through an affected device.
This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write files to the underlying operating system that could be used later to elevate to root.
Note: Cisco has assigned this security advisory a Security Impact Rating (SIR) of Critical rather than High as the score indicates. The reason is that exploitation of this vulnerability could result in an attacker elevating privileges to root.
Note: To exploit this vulnerability, the WebDialer service must be enabled. WebDialer is disabled by default. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability in the API Request component. An authenticated attacker with low-level privileges (flow author role) can bypass SSRF protections by enabling the follow_redirects parameter and supplying a public URL that redirects to internal/localhost addresses. The vulnerability exists because the application validates only the initial URL but does not re-validate redirect destinations. This allows attackers to access internal HTTP services, localhost endpoints, cloud metadata services, and private network resources that should be unreachable when SSRF protection is enabled. Successful exploitation can lead to disclosure of sensitive information including credentials, tokens, internal API responses, and administrative panel data. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.7 is affected by a server-side request forgery vulnerability with the adminCenter-1.0 feature enabled. |
| c3p0 is a JDBC Connection pooling library. In versions prior to 0.14.0, c3p0 in combination with other libraries, can compose to a "sink" for deserialization gadgets. The JDBC spec's DataSource.getConnection() and ConnectionPoolDataSource.getPooledConnection() match the getXXX() form, so JavaBean libraries treat them as "properties" assumed safe while they actually call into JDBC drivers. Attackers can thus craft malicious DataSource objects whose property lookups invoke vulnerable drivers, then smuggle them in serialized form to where an application deserializes and auto-resolves bean properties — triggering the attack. This requires a susceptible DataSource/ConnectionPoolDataSource and JDBC driver on the CLASSPATH, plus a carrier that auto-looks-up JavaBean properties on = deserialization, most commonly a collection paired with an Apache commons-beanutils Comparator that sorts by bean properties. c3p0 supplied that susceptible DataSource/ConnectionPoolDataSource, which was an essential component of the trigger. This issue has been fixed in version 0.14.0. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The legacy RSSReaderComponent in rss.py and SearXNG component in searxng.py make unvalidated HTTP requests to user-controlled URLs, bypassing SSRF protections introduced in version 1.9.3. An authenticated attacker can exploit this to access internal resources including cloud metadata services (AWS/Azure/GCP IMDS), potentially exfiltrating IAM credentials and enumerating internal networks. The vulnerability can also be triggered through prompt injection in agentic workflows due to tool_mode=True exposure. |
| IBM watsonx.data intelligence 5.2.0, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.3.0 s vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. |
| Open WebUI before 0.6.27 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /api/v1/retrieval/process/web endpoint that allows authenticated users to bypass SSRF protections. Attackers can manipulate URL parameters with location redirect headers to access internal services and potentially execute commands via instance secrets. |
| Oj (Optimized JSON) is a JSON parser and Object marshaller packaged as a Ruby gem. In versions prior to 3.17.3, Oj.load in :object mode reads uninitialized stack memory (and, for long keys, reads out of bounds) when parsing a JSON object whose key is 254 bytes or longer. The interned bytes can surface to the caller, disclosing process stack memory. In ext/oj/intern.c, form_attr() handles the long-key path by allocating a heap buffer, `b`, populating it with the attribute name, and then freeing it — but it passed the uninitialized stack buffer buf (not b) to rb_intern3(). rb_intern3 therefore reads len + 1 bytes of uninitialized stack memory. When the key length is >= 256, it also reads out of bounds past the 256-byte buf. The resulting bytes are interned and can reach the caller via the produced Symbol or via the EncodingError message raised on invalid UTF-8, leaking process stack contents. This issue has been fixed in version 3.17.3. |
| A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Hotel Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /admin/mod_users/controller.php?action=edit of the component POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the URL component ( src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data_source/url.py ) due to a Time-of-Check/Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition that can be exploited via DNS rebinding. |
| DVP80ES3 with Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel vulnerability. |
| txtai through 9.10.0, fixed in commit 11b32da, exposes an API /reindex endpoint whose function body parameter is resolved through txtai.util.Resolver, which performs __import__ and getattr on the caller-supplied dotted path with no allowlist. When the API is exposed with no TOKEN configured (authentication is opt-in, so all endpoints are unauthenticated) and the index is configured writable, a remote attacker can set function to an arbitrary callable such as subprocess.getoutput, achieving remote code execution as the server process during reindexing. Exploitation requires those deployment conditions (API exposed, no TOKEN, writable index); it is not the default configuration. The fix gates the endpoint behind a new reindex configuration flag. |
| IBM UCD - IBM DevOps Deploy 8.1 through 8.1.2.6, and 8.2 through 8.2.1.0 uses Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) which could allow an attacker to carry out privileged actions and retrieve sensitive information as the domain name is not being limited to only trusted domains. |
| ACE vulnerability in conditional configuration file processing by QOS.CH logback-core up to and including version 1.5.36 in Java applications, allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code circumventing existing protections against CVE-2025-11226 by compromising an existing logback configuration file or by injecting an environment variable before program execution.
A successful attack requires the presence of Janino library to be present on the user's class path. In addition, the attacker must have write access to a
configuration file. Alternatively, the attacker could inject a malicious
environment variable pointing to a malicious configuration file. In both
cases, the attack requires existing privilege.
Please note that in logack version 1.5.37 conditional processing using Janino was removed. |
| The WPForms – Easy Form Builder for WordPress – Contact Forms, Payment Forms, Surveys, & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') in all versions up to, and including, 1.10.2 This is due to `get_reply_to_address()` processing the Reply-To display name through smart-tag expansion with context `'notification'` instead of `'notification-reply-to'`, which bypasses email-address validation while `wpforms_sanitize_textarea_field()` intentionally preserves CR/LF characters that are never stripped before the display name is concatenated into the raw `Reply-To:` mail header string. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary additional email headers — such as `Bcc:` — into outgoing notification emails, silently blind-copying all notification email copies to an attacker-controlled address. Exploitation requires that a form notification is configured to use a Paragraph Text (textarea) field as the Reply-To display name via a Smart Tag. |
| An issue in Alexantr filemanager v.1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the filemanager.php component |
