| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| SAP Commerce (Backoffice) uses the deprecated X-FRAME-OPTIONS header to protect against clickjacking. While this protection remains effective now, it may not be the case in the future as browsers might discontinue support for this header in favor of the frame-ancestors CSP directive. Hence, clickjacking could become possible then, and lead to exposure and modification of sensitive information. |
| Improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames issue exists in Wi-Fi AP UNIT 'AC-WPS-11ac series'. If a user views and clicks on the content on the malicious page while logged in, unintended operations may be performed. |
| Clickjacking vulnerability in Clibo Manager v1.1.9.12 in the '/public/login' directory, a login panel. This vulnerability occurs due to the absence of an X-Frame-Options server-side header. An attacker could overlay a transparent iframe to perform click hijacking on victims. |
| Cross-Frame Scripting (XFS) vulnerability in BoomCMS v9.1.4 from UXB London. XFS is a web attack technique that exploits specific browser bugs to spy on users via JavaScript. This type of attack is based on social engineering and depends entirely on the browser chosen by the user, so it is perceived as a minor threat to web application security. This vulnerability only works in older browsers. |
| ArcSearch for iOS versions prior to 1.45.2 could display a different domain in the address bar than the content being shown after an iframe-triggered URI-scheme navigation, increasing spoofing risk. |
| A
Clickjacking vulnerability in TP-Link Archer C1200 web management page allows an attacker to trick users into performing unintended actions via rendered UI layers or frames.This issue affects Archer C1200 <= 1.1.5. |
| NEC Corporation's WebSAM DeploymentManager v6.0 to v6.80 allows an attacker to reset configurations or restart products via network with X-FRAME-OPTIONS is not specified. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can deceive users into performing unintended actions due to improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames.
|
| Improper restriction of rendered UI layers or frames issue exists in HMI ViewJet C-more series, which may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to trick the product user to perform operations on the product's web pages. |
| HAProxy 2.2 through 3.1.6, in certain uncommon configurations, has a sample_conv_regsub heap-based buffer overflow because of mishandling of the replacement of multiple short patterns with a longer one. |
| Missing about:blank indicator in custom-sized new windows in Dia before 1.9.0 on macOS could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted domain in the window title and mislead users about the current site. |
| Affected is an unknown function of the component Login Page. The manipulation leads to improper restriction of rendered ui layers. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. |
| This vulnerability allowed a site to enter fullscreen, after a user click, without a full-screen notification (toast) appearing. Without this notification, users could potentially be misled about what site they were on if a malicious site renders a fake UI (like a fake address bar.) |
| Incorrect security UI in Permissions in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| Incorrect security UI in Omnibox in Google Chrome on Android prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker to spoof the contents of the Omnibox (URL bar) via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| Policy bypass in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in browser UI in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Incorrect security UI in Downloads in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| A regression in the way hashes were calculated caused rules containing the address range syntax (x.x.x.x - y.y.y.y) that only differ in the address range(s) involved to be silently dropped as duplicates. Only the first of such rules is actually loaded into pf. Ranges expressed using the address[/mask-bits] syntax were not affected.
Some keywords representing actions taken on a packet-matching rule, such as 'log', 'return tll', or 'dnpipe', may suffer from the same issue. It is unlikely that users have such configurations, as these rules would always be redundant.
Affected rules are silently ignored, which can lead to unexpected behaviour including over- and underblocking. |
| The issue was addressed with improved UI handling. This issue is fixed in Safari 17.6, macOS Monterey 12.7.6, macOS Sonoma 14.6, macOS Ventura 13.6.8. Visiting a website that frames malicious content may lead to UI spoofing. |
