Export limit exceeded: 373137 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (48456 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-62880 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-14 | 7.8 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows NTFS allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62885 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-14 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62887 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-14 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows NTFS allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65794 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Buffer over-read in Windows SMB Client allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62738 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-08-14 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Management Instrumentation allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19594 | 1 Snowflake | 1 Snowflake Python Apis | 2026-08-14 | 8.1 High |
| Insufficient input sanitization in Snowflake Python API (`snowflake.core`) versions prior to 1.13.0 allowed confused-deputy privilege escalation through two related weaknesses: path traversal (CWE-22) via unencoded `..` identifier path segments, and HTTP parameter pollution (CWE-141) via unencoded `&`/`#`/`=` characters in query string values. An attacker with access to a downstream application built on snowflake.core could exploit the path traversal by supplying `..` as an object name, causing `snowflake.core` to issue REST requests against a parent resource or exploit the parameter pollution by injecting `&`/`#`/`=` into a free-form name field to override constraints on swap, clone, or rename operations — all executed under the application's privileged session. Successful exploitation requires the attacker to control an identifier or object-name string in an application built on snowflake.core that passes it to `snowflake.core` under a higher-privileged Snowflake session (e.g., an EXECUTE AS OWNER stored procedure, Streamlit app, or Native App). The fix is available in Snowflake Python API version 1.13.0, which also addresses several additional security findings. Users must manually upgrade. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18724 | 1 Open-iscsi Project | 1 Open-iscsi | 2026-08-14 | 7.6 High |
| AI_ONLY_REPORT package: iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.1.11-0.git4b3e853.el10 ------ Summary: Stack Buffer Overflow in idbm_recinfo_config via Malicious iSCSI Target: a crafted SendTargets TargetName can inject an extra configuration line into a persisted node record and later cause a stack buffer overflow when that record is reparsed. Requirements to exploit: An attacker must control an iSCSI target or tamper with SendTargets discovery traffic, return a crafted `TargetName` containing a newline and oversized injected key or value data, have the victim run persistent discovery, and then trigger a later node-record read such as update or login. Component affected: `iscsi-initiator-utils`; `usr/idbm.c:idbm_recinfo_config`, with attacker-controlled input reaching it through SendTargets handling in `usr/discovery.c` and later record serialization in `usr/idbm.c`. Version affected: `iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.1.11-0.git4b3e853.el10` Patch available: no released package fix established; proposed patch included below Version fixed: unknown Upstream coordination: Not notified. CVSS: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H - 7.5 (HIGH) AV:N - The attacker can supply the malicious data over the network in a SendTargets discovery response. AC:L - The target-name length cap still leaves enough room for a newline plus an overlong injected key; no race or unusual memory state is required. PR:N - No prior access to the initiator is required. UI:R - The victim must run SendTargets discovery that persists records and later read the saved record. S:U - The impact remains within the initiator-side component that parses and stores its own database records. C:L - Memory corruption could expose limited process memory, but confidentiality impact is not demonstrated. I:L - Process memory corruption can affect integrity, but reliable code execution is not established. A:H - The clearest supported outcome is a crash during config parsing. Impact: Moderate. This issue could otherwise resemble an Important remote denial-of-service flaw, but Red Hat rates such issues lower when they are less easily exploited or depend on narrower conditions. Here, exploitation requires a multi-step SendTargets discovery workflow, persistence of the discovered record, and a later reread of that record. The strongest supported outcome is denial of service or other memory corruption, while code execution remains unproven. Embargo: no Reason: The available evidence supports a multi-step, configuration-dependent denial-of-service or memory-corruption issue rather than a demonstrated remote code execution flaw, so embargoed handling does not appear necessary. Acknowledgement: Aisle Research Vulnerability Details: `idbm_recinfo_config()` copies config keys and values into fixed stack buffers without bounds checks: ```c while (*nl && !isspace(c = *nl) && *nl != '=') { *(name+i) = *nl; i+; nl+; } ... while (*nl) { *(value+i) = *nl; i+; nl+; } ``` In this code path, `name` and `value` are 128-byte and 256-byte stack buffers, so an injected key longer than 128 bytes or a value longer than 256 bytes can corrupt stack memory. During SendTargets discovery, attacker-controlled `TargetName` text is copied into the node record and later written back to disk without control-character filtering: ```c strlcpy(rec->name, targetname, TARGET_NAME_MAXLEN); ... if (strlen(info[i].value)) fprintf(f, "%s = %s\n", info[i].name, info[i].value); ``` `process_sendtargets_response()` treats `TargetName=` records as discovery input, and `add_target_record()` accepts names up to `TARGET_NAME_MAXLEN`. That limit is 255 bytes in this package, which is still enough to carry a newline plus a key longer than the 128-byte `name` buffer. A `TargetName` such as `iqn.test\nAAAA...=B` can therefore split the serialized `node.name` entry into two lines and inject a second config line. Persistent SendTargets discovery stores discovered node records unless nonpersistent mode is used, and later discovery update/login or explicit node operations reread those saved records. The 2048-byte line buffer in `idbm_recinfo_config()` does not prevent this because the injected line only needs to exceed 128 bytes for the key or 256 bytes for the value. Based on the available evidence, the supported impact is a crash or other memory corruption during reparsing. Reliable code execution is plausible but not established. Steps to reproduce: 1. Run a malicious SendTargets responder, or intercept discovery traffic, and return a `TargetName` value containing a newline and an oversized injected key, for example `TargetName=iqn.test\nAAAAAAAA...(>=129 chars)=B`. 2. Run SendTargets discovery in its normal persistent mode. The default `iscsiadm -m discovery ...` workflow persists records unless nonpersistent mode is selected. 3. Inspect the saved node record and confirm that it contains both the expected `node.name = ...` line and an injected `AAAA...=B` line. 4. Trigger any operation that rereads the node record, such as discovery update, node update, or login. 5. Observe a crash during parsing. With instrumentation enabled, the overflow should be reported in `idbm_recinfo_config()`. Mitigation: Until a fix is available, avoid persistent SendTargets discovery against untrusted or interceptable networks. Where operationally acceptable, use nonpersistent discovery, and remove node records created from untrusted discovery results before later update or login operations. Proposed Fix: The fix should address both parts of the chain: bound the key and value copies in `idbm_recinfo_config()` and reject control characters in `TargetName` before persistence. ```diff diff --git a/usr/idbm.c b/usr/idbm.c @@ void idbm_recinfo_config(recinfo_t *info, FILE *f) while (*nl && !isspace(c = *nl) && *nl != '=') { *(name+i) = *nl; i+; nl+; } + while (*nl && !isspace(c = *nl) && *nl != '=') { + if (i >= NAME_MAXVAL - 1) { + log_warning("Config file line %d key too long", line_number); + break; + } + name[i++] = *nl++; + } @@ while (*nl) { *(value+i) = *nl; i+; nl+; } + while (*nl) { + if (i >= VALUE_MAXVAL - 1) { + log_warning("Config file line %d value too long", line_number); + break; + } + value[i++] = *nl++; + } diff --git a/usr/discovery.c b/usr/discovery.c @@ static int add_target_record(char *name, char *end, discovery_rec_t *drec, while ((nul < end) && (*nul != '\0')) nul++; + for (char *p = name; p < nul; p++) { + if (*p == '\n' || *p == '\r' || (unsigned char)*p < 0x20) { + log_error("TargetName contains control characters, rejecting"); + return 0; + } + } ``` ------ This report was generated using AI technology. Always review AI-generated content prior to use | ||||
| CVE-2026-19815 | 1 Totolink | 2 A800r, A800r Firmware | 2026-08-14 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw has been found in TOTOLINK A800R 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. Affected by this vulnerability is the function setParentalRules of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component firewall.so. Executing a manipulation of the argument urlKeyword can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19792 | 1 Tenda | 1 G0 | 2026-08-14 | 8.8 High |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda G0 up to 20260625. Impacted is the function setPortMapping of the file /goform/module of the component httpd web management interface. Performing a manipulation of the argument portMappingServer/porMappingtInternal/portMappingExternal results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66810 | 1 Microsoft | 10 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Office 2019 and 7 more | 2026-08-14 | 5.5 Medium |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68793 | 1 Microsoft | 12 365, 365 Apps, Excel and 9 more | 2026-08-14 | 7.8 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55400 | 1 Absolute | 1 Secure Access | 2026-08-14 | N/A |
| CVE-2026-55400 is an integer underflow in Secure Access servers prior to version 14.57. Attackers with an authenticated session can send specially crafted traffic to a server in a non-default configuration and cause a persistent denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55402 | 1 Absolute | 1 Secure Access | 2026-08-14 | N/A |
| CVE-2026-55402 is an out of bounds read vulnerability in Secure Access servers prior to version 14.57. Attackers with an ‘in the middle’ position can send specially crafted data to a server causing a persistent denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58416 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-14 | 7.1 High |
| Fork-PR Actions task can read a third private repository via the collaborative-owner branch (missing fork-PR guard) | ||||
| CVE-2025-62315 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Aion | 2026-08-14 | 3.4 Low |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where certain input fields do not enforce sufficient server-side input validation. Unexpected or crafted input may be accepted by the application, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or security impact under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21832 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Aion | 2026-08-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where indirect prompt injection can lead to HTML injection in rendered output. Injected markup may be displayed to users, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or security impact under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73505 | 1 Jandedobbeleer | 1 Oh-my-posh | 2026-08-14 | 7.8 High |
| Oh My Posh is the most customisable and low-latency cross platform/shell prompt renderer. Prior to 29.35.1, the setStyle() function in src/segments/path.go passed pt.Path, which includes raw folder names, to template.Render, whose function map exposes cmd, so an attacker-controlled directory name containing a Go template expression could execute arbitrary operating system commands as the current user whenever the prompt rendered inside that directory or a descendant. This issue is fixed in version 29.35.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65933 | 1 Silabs.com | 1 Bt122 | 2026-08-14 | N/A |
| A malformed Bluetooth connection request message can cause the BT122 to leak potentially sensitive information. See vulnerability B-E4 in the related paper below. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65936 | 1 Silabs.com | 1 Wiseconnect | 2026-08-14 | N/A |
| A malformed Bluetooth connection request message can cause the RS9116W/SiWx917 to leak potentially sensitive information. See vulnerability B-E4 in the related paper below. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73647 | 1 Quasarframework | 1 Quasar | 2026-08-14 | 5.6 Medium |
| Quasar Framework is a framework for building high-performance Vue.js user interfaces. Prior to 2.22.0, the public extend() utility in ui/src/utils/extend/extend.js recursively copied attacker-controlled object keys during extend(true, target, source) deep merges without rejecting an own __proto__ property. The merge could descend into the prototype object and write attacker-controlled properties to Object.prototype in the same JavaScript process. Applications that passed user-controlled or partially user-controlled objects to extend() could experience logic bypass, unsafe default-option injection, denial of service, or other application-specific impact when polluted properties were later consumed. This issue is fixed in version 2.22.0. | ||||