| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The GEO my WP WordPress plugin before 4.5.5.3 does not perform any ownership or capability check on two of its logged-in AJAX actions, allowing users with subscriber-level access or above to modify or permanently delete other users' and posts' geolocation records by supplying arbitrary record IDs. |
| The Dokan: AI Powered WooCommerce Multivendor Marketplace Solution WordPress plugin before 5.0.9 does not verify order ownership on a REST endpoint that performs bulk order-status changes, allowing users with a Dokan vendor account to modify the status of any WooCommerce order on the marketplace, including orders belonging to other vendors and the store's own customers. |
| Russh is a Rust SSH client & server library. Prior to 0.62.5, russh dispatches channel-scoped Handler callbacks for recipient channel IDs that were never opened or confirmed in russh/src/server/encrypted.rs, server_read_authenticated, and the exec_request callback. Version 0.62.5 fixes the issue. |
| A permissions issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in Safari 26.6, iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Tahoe 26.6, tvOS 26.6, visionOS 26.6, watchOS 26.6. Maliciously crafted web content may violate iframe sandboxing policy. |
| GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11. |
| Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8. A maliciously crafted ZIP archive may bypass Gatekeeper checks. |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Presentation in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, OER parser recurses without depth limit on self-referential IEEE 1609.2 schema. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcutil-fips 2.0.7 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.7 (2.1.X series). |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, Lazy ASN.1 sequence forcing resets nesting-depth guard. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series). |
| The Grav form plugin (getgrav/grav-plugin-form) before 9.1.13 contains an open redirect vulnerability. Since v9.1.11, the redirect process action evaluates user-supplied form data inside Twig expressions, and Grav::redirect() accepts external URLs without origin validation. When a form blueprint defines a redirect target such as redirect: "{{ form.value('next') }}" using an attacker-controllable field, an unauthenticated form submitter can supply a value like https://evil.com to cause a 302 redirect to an arbitrary external site, enabling phishing. |
| better-auth passkey versions before 1.4.0 contain an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the passkey deletion endpoint that allows authenticated users to delete arbitrary passkeys by ID. Attackers with valid sessions can submit crafted requests to the delete-passkey endpoint with enumerated passkey IDs to remove other users' passkeys. |
| axios versions 0.31.1 before 0.33.0 and 1.15.1 before 1.18.0 contain an incomplete depth-limit bypass in toFormData.js when serializing objects with top-level keys ending in '{}'. Attackers who control object keys and nested values passed to axios form or parameter serialization can trigger a RangeError from JSON.stringify, causing denial of service in the affected request path. |
| Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Menulux Software Inc. Mobile App allows Software Integrity Attack.
This issue affects Mobile App: through 12.05.2026. |
| Jinher OA C6 contains an XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability in the /c6/JHSoft.Web.HrmAttendance/sp_manager_getUserlist.aspx/GetXmlHttp endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted XML payload to read arbitrary files from the server via an out-of-band attack. |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to bypass no-referrer policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) |
| Improper handling of the returnUrl parameter in the Forgot Password function of Veeam Service Provider Console allows an unauthenticated attacker to control the domain of the generated password reset link. When the targeted user clicks the link delivered by email, the reset code is transmitted to an attacker-controlled host, allowing the attacker to take over the account. |
| A logic vulnerability in the password reset token validation routine implemented by osTicket in versions prior to v1.17.8 and v1.18.4. During the password reset process, the application retrieves the timestamp associated with the provided token and checks whether the configured validity period has expired. Consequently, the expiry check is only performed if the timestamp lookup fails, allowing tokens with an existing timestamp to bypass the intended expiry validation. Therefore, an attacker able to obtain a valid password reset token could reuse it to perform an unauthorised password reset and compromise the affected account. |
