Search Results (6867 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-20002 1 Cisco 1 Secure Firewall Management Center 2026-04-16 8.1 High
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure FMC Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to inadequate validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain full access to the database and read certain files on the underlying operating system. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid user credentials.
CVE-2026-20062 1 Cisco 1 Adaptive Security Appliance Software 2026-04-16 7.2 High
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software in multiple context mode could allow an authenticated, local attacker with administrative privileges in one context to copy files to or from another context, including configuration files. This vulnerability is due to improper access controls for Secure Copy Protocol (SCP) operations when the CiscoSSH stack is enabled. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to a non-admin context of the device and issuing crafted SCP copy commands in that non-admin context. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read, create, or overwrite sensitive files that belong to another context, including the admin and system contexts. The attacker cannot directly impact the availability of services pertaining to other contexts. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials for a non-admin context. Note: An attacker cannot list or enumerate files from another context and would need to know the exact file path, which increases the complexity of a successful attack.
CVE-2026-20018 1 Cisco 2 Secure Firewall Management Center, Secure Firewall Threat Defense 2026-04-16 5.9 Medium
A vulnerability in the sftunnel functionality of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrative privileges to write arbitrary files as root on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of the directory path during file synchronization. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a directory path outside of the expected file location. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to create or replace any file on the underlying operating system.
CVE-2026-20126 1 Cisco 1 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager 2026-04-16 8.8 High
A vulnerability in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager could allow an authenticated, local attacker with low privileges to gain root privileges on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to an insufficient user authentication mechanism in the REST API. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a request to the REST API of the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain root privileges on the underlying operating system.
CVE-2026-20129 1 Cisco 1 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager 2026-04-16 9.8 Critical
A vulnerability in the API user authentication of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to an affected system as a user who has the netadmin role. The vulnerability is due to improper authentication for requests that are sent to the API. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to the API of an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute commands with the privileges of the netadmin role. Note: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager releases 20.18 and later are not affected by this vulnerability. 
CVE-2026-20131 1 Cisco 1 Secure Firewall Management Center 2026-04-16 10 Critical
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary Java code as root on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insecure deserialization of a user-supplied Java byte stream. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted serialized Java object to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device and elevate privileges to root. Note: If the FMC management interface does not have public internet access, the attack surface that is associated with this vulnerability is reduced.
CVE-2005-1517 1 Cisco 1 Firewall Services Module 2026-04-16 N/A
Unknown vulnerability in Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM) 2.3.1 and earlier, when using URL, FTP, or HTTPS filtering exceptions, allows certain TCP packets to bypass access control lists (ACLs).
CVE-2002-1105 1 Cisco 1 Vpn Client 2026-04-16 N/A
Cisco Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client software 2.x.x, and 3.x before 3.5.1C, allows local users to use a utility program to obtain the group password.
CVE-2000-0150 2 Checkpoint, Cisco 2 Firewall-1, Pix Firewall Software 2026-04-16 N/A
Check Point Firewall-1 allows remote attackers to bypass port access restrictions on an FTP server by forcing it to send malicious packets that Firewall-1 misinterprets as a valid 227 response to a client's PASV attempt.
CVE-2002-1104 1 Cisco 1 Vpn Client 2026-04-16 N/A
Cisco Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client software 2.x.x and 3.x before 3.0.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via TCP packets with source and destination ports of 137 (NETBIOS).
CVE-1999-0453 1 Cisco 1 Router 2026-04-16 N/A
An attacker can identify a CISCO device by sending a SYN packet to port 1999, which is for the Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP).
CVE-2002-1103 1 Cisco 2 Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software, Vpn 3002 Hardware Client 2026-04-16 N/A
Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, 3.6(Rel), and 3.x before 3.5.5, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via (1) malformed or (2) large ISAKMP packets.
CVE-2002-1101 1 Cisco 2 Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software, Vpn 3002 Hardware Client 2026-04-16 N/A
Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, 3.6(Rel), and 3.x before 3.5.5, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a long user name.
CVE-2005-1058 1 Cisco 1 Ios 2026-04-16 N/A
Cisco IOS 12.2T, 12.3 and 12.3T, when processing an ISAKMP profile that specifies XAUTH authentication after Phase 1 negotiation, may not process certain attributes in the ISAKMP profile that specifies XAUTH, which allows remote attackers to bypass XAUTH and move to Phase 2 negotiations.
CVE-2001-0288 1 Cisco 1 Ios 2026-04-16 N/A
Cisco switches and routers running IOS 12.1 and earlier produce predictable TCP Initial Sequence Numbers (ISNs), which allows remote attackers to spoof or hijack TCP connections.
CVE-2005-1057 1 Cisco 1 Ios 2026-04-16 N/A
Cisco IOS 12.2T, 12.3 and 12.3T, when using Easy VPN Server XAUTH version 6 authentication, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a "malformed packet."
CVE-2002-1100 1 Cisco 2 Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software, Vpn 3002 Hardware Client 2026-04-16 N/A
Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, and 3.x before 3.5.3, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long (1) username or (2) password to the HTML login interface.
CVE-2001-0163 1 Cisco 1 Aironet Ap340 2026-04-16 N/A
Cisco AP340 base station produces predictable TCP Initial Sequence Numbers (ISNs), which allows remote attackers to spoof or hijack TCP connections.
CVE-2002-1099 1 Cisco 2 Vpn 3000 Concentrator Series Software, Vpn 3002 Hardware Client 2026-04-16 N/A
Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator 2.2.x, and 3.x before 3.5.3, allows remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information without authentication by directly accessing certain HTML pages.
CVE-1999-1582 1 Cisco 1 Pix Firewall 2026-04-16 N/A
By design, the "established" command on the Cisco PIX firewall allows connections from one host to arbitrary ports of a target host if an alternative conduit has already been allowed, which can cause administrators to configure less restrictive access controls than intended if they do not understand this functionality.