| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| SAP S/4HANA and SAP SCM Characteristic Propagation has remote code execution vulnerability. This allows an attacker with user level privileges to create a new report with his own code potentially gaining full control of the affected SAP system causing high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application. |
| The GuiXT application, which is integrated with SAP GUI for Windows, uses obfuscation algorithms instead of secure symmetric ciphers for storing the credentials of an RFC user on the client PC. This leads to a high impact on confidentiality because any attacker who gains access to the user hive of this user�s windows registry could recreate the original password. There is no impact on integrity or availability of the application |
| SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition or on Premise (SCM Master Data Layer (MDL)) allows an authenticated attacker with SAP standard authorization to execute a certain function module remotely and replace arbitrary ABAP programs, including SAP standard programs. This is due to lack of input validation and no authorization checks. This has low Confidentiality impact but high impact on integrity and availability to the application. |
| Open Policy Agent (OPA) is an open source, general-purpose policy engine. Prior to version 1.4.0, when run as a server, OPA exposes an HTTP Data API for reading and writing documents. Requesting a virtual document through the Data API entails policy evaluation, where a Rego query containing a single data document reference is constructed from the requested path. This query is then used for policy evaluation. A HTTP request path can be crafted in a way that injects Rego code into the constructed query. The evaluation result cannot be made to return any other data than what is generated by the requested path, but this path can be misdirected, and the injected Rego code can be crafted to make the query succeed or fail; opening up for oracle attacks or, given the right circumstances, erroneous policy decision results. Furthermore, the injected code can be crafted to be computationally expensive, resulting in a Denial Of Service (DoS) attack. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0. A workaround involves having network access to OPA’s RESTful APIs being limited to `localhost` and/or trusted networks, unless necessary for production reasons. |
| ZTE's ZXCDN product is affected by a Struts remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker can remotely execute commands with non-root privileges. |
| The The BuddyPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 14.3.3. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes. |
| SAP Landscape Transformation (SLT) allows an attacker with user privileges to exploit a vulnerability in the function module exposed via RFC. This flaw enables the injection of arbitrary ABAP code into the system, bypassing essential authorization checks. This vulnerability effectively functions as a backdoor, creating the risk of full system compromise, undermining the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the system. |
| An OpenSSH daemon listens on TCP port 22. There is a hard-coded entry in the "/etc/shadow" file in the firmware image for the "root" user. However, in the default SSH configuration the "PermitRootLogin" is disabled, preventing the root user from logging in via SSH. This configuration can be bypassed/changed by an attacker through multiple paths though. |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in VillaTheme HAPPY happy-helpdesk-support-ticket-system allows Remote Code Inclusion.This issue affects HAPPY: from n/a through <= 1.0.7. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Icegram Icegram Express Pro email-subscribers-premium allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Icegram Express Pro: from n/a through <= 5.9.5. |
| iib0011 omni-tools v0.4.0 is vulnerable to remote code execution via unsafe JSON deserialization. |
| A vulnerability in the Python-Future 1.0.0 module allows for arbitrary code execution via the unintended import of a file named test.py. When the module is loaded, it automatically imports test.py, if present in the same directory or in the sys.path. This behavior can be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to write files to the server, allowing the execution of arbitrary code. NOTE: Multiple third parties have disputed this issue and stated that it is not a security flaw in python-future and is a documented feature of Python’s import system in the handling of sys.path. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the URL processing functionality of PHProxy version 1.1.1 and prior. The input validation for the _proxurl parameter can be bypassed, allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to submit a specially crafted URL |
| An issue in Studio 3T v.2025.1.0 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload to the child_process module |
| Octo-STS is a GitHub App that acts like a Security Token Service (STS) for the GitHub API. Octo-STS versions before v0.5.3 are vulnerable to unauthenticated SSRF by abusing fields in OpenID Connect tokens. Malicious tokens were shown to trigger internal network requests which could reflect error logs with sensitive information. Upgrade to v0.5.3 to resolve this issue. This version includes patch sets to sanitize input and redact logging. |
| Akamai CloudTest before 60 2025.06.09 (12989) allows SSRF. |
| Lychee is a free, open-source photo-management tool. Prior to version 6.6.13, a critical Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the `/api/v2/Photo::fromUrl` endpoint. This flaw lets an attacker instruct the application’s backend to make HTTP requests to any URL they choose. Consequently, internal network resources—such as localhost services or cloud-provider metadata endpoints—become reachable. The endpoint takes a URL from the user and calls it server-side via fopen() without any safeguards. There is no IP address validation, nor are there any allow-list, timeout, or size restrictions. Because of this, attackers can point the application at internal targets. Using this flaw, an attacker can perform internal port scans or retrieve sensitive cloud metadata. Version 6.6.13 contains a patch for the issue. |
| Remote attackers can execute arbitrary code in the context of the vulnerable service process. |
| Delta Electronics COMMGR has Code Injection vulnerability. |
| Bluebird devices contain a pre-loaded file manager application. This application exposes an unsecured service provider "com.bluebird.system.koreanpost.IsdcardRemoteService". A local attacker can bind to the AIDL-type service to copy and delete arbitrary files from device's storage with system-level permissions.
Version 1.4.4 is vulnerable, vendor reverted vulnerable versions to older version: 1.3.6 |
