| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the dynamic redirect handler that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the board origin by crafting a malicious javascript: URI that bypasses host validation. Attackers can embed the board hostname in the URI authority component and use percent-encoded newlines to evade server-side filters, causing authenticated users who perform a Follow action to execute attacker-supplied JavaScript in their browser. |
| Cross-site scripting in SanitizerAPI in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.36 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| HTML::FormHandler versions before 0.410002 for Perl render field attributes into HTML without escaping using the process_attrs method.
Any application with fields or field labels where some attributes are built from data rather than literals allows attacker-influenced text in an attribute value that can override the field attributes or embed JavaScript in rendered pages.
For example, the RadioGroup widget uses the process_attrs method via the render_option and wrap_radio methods. |
| HTML::FormHandler versions before 0.410002 for Perl render option group labels and radio button labels into HTML without escaping.
The Select, RadioGroup, CheckboxGroup and HorizCheckboxGroup widgets render a group label unescaped, Select into a label attribute and the other three into element content. RadioGroup also renders each radio button's own label unescaped.
Any application whose option list is built from data rather than literals, using options_from, an options_fieldname method, or the DBIC model, allows attacker-influenced text in a label that can override the options or embed JavaScript in rendered pages. |
| HTML::FormHandler versions before 0.410000 for Perl allow cross-site scripting via a submitted value rendered unescaped in an error message.
The wrappers and renderers that emit a form's errors interpolate the error string straight into HTML with no escaping. Two of the library's own messages, no_match and not_allowed, splice the submitted value into that string, and a failing type constraint puts the rejected value into the message it builds, which _apply_actions hands to add_error.
A field declared with a check regexp, a check list or a type constraint reaches those messages, with no custom validator and no non-default configuration. Errors rendered through an application's own escaping template layer rather than the library's rendering roles are not affected.
A request over the network that submits markup to such a field gets it back live inside the error span, running script in the victim's origin. Re-rendering a rejected value later gives the stored variant. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.2 suffer from a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Playground chat interface. |
| The SureForms – Contact Form Builder, AI Forms, Payment Form, Survey & Quiz plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Text Field Entity-Encoded Payload in all versions up to, and including, 2.12.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| The Gallery : FooGallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'custom_settings' Shortcode Attribute in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| Cross-site scripting in the Evernote and Google Keep note importers in Standard Notes for Android through 3.201.24 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the application context when a victim imports a crafted .enex or Google Keep HTML file, leading to theft of encryption keys and note data, and arbitrary invocation of native device APIs. |
| Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access. |
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the grid_datasource.php component of AppNitro MachForm v30 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the victim's browser via injecting a crafted payload into the filter[filters][0][field] parameter. |
| NuBrowser lacks protocol whitelist validation for the S.browser_fallback_url field of intent://, allowing attackers to inject javascript: URLs via 302 redirects. This results in a universal cross‑site scripting (UXSS) vulnerability that enables script execution within the origin of arbitrary websites. |
| The vulnerability, if exploited, could allow a miscreant to run arbitrary JavaScript code in a browser session of a PIMBoards user who was socially engineered to click on a malicious link. |
| Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains an Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to protection mechanism bypass. |
| An authenticated stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Column Management component of ClassCMS 1CMS v5.6 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via injecting a crafted payload into the title field. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter V2412 (All versions < V2412.0013), Teamcenter V2506 (All versions < V2506.0010), Teamcenter V2512 (All versions < V2512.2607), Teamcenter V2606 (All versions < V2606.2607). Affected applications do not properly encode user-supplied input reflected into HTML attribute contexts within the authentication redirect flow (/auth/ endpoint).
This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript into the browser of an authenticated user who loads a crafted URL, enabling the attacker to perform actions within the victim's Teamcenter session. |
| SiYuan before 3.8.2 trusts the attacker-writable text/siyuan clipboard MIME type and skips sanitization in the paste handler, allowing code execution in the Node-enabled desktop renderer. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that write to the clipboard, and when pasted into SiYuan, injected scripts execute with full Node.js access through the Electron main process. |
| The Auth0 AD/LDAP Connector is vulnerable to stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issues due to improper HTML encoding of data in search results and updater log content displayed in the admin panel. An authenticated user with privileges to modify directory attributes, or a low-privileged local user on the host where the connector is installed, could insert script content. This script content could then execute in an administrator's browser when they view the affected search results or update logs. |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
